So let me get this straight! Because these young men were engaging in what you consider immoral behaviour, they deserve to be falsely convicted of rape???? If they are guilty of rape, of course they should be convicted, but where is the evidence of this crime?
There seems to be plenty of exculpatory evidence.
Removed from the "Prom Court" - indicted for "Rape", I believe the boys removed from the prom court with go on with life unscathed. Being indicted for rape with no evidence is a whole different thing.
NeonKnight, It seems that ccwoman does not understand why people are discussing who the woman is in this case. Hence the no means no response. ccwoman seems to have:
1. missed the idea that some people doubt that a woman of her past and occupation would have said no but rather how much you willing to pay.
2. bought into the leftist idea that confuses commercial disputes with rape. If someone has sex with a sex professional and then does not pay, it is not rape though the left loves to yell rape if the do not like the accused, but rather it is a commercial dispute and theft of services laws are the appropriate action against the accuse.
Just goes to show when you buy the arguments of the left, sometime you don't clearly think through what others are saying.