Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accused dog-napper jailedtook neighbor's dog without permission, neutered it
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | April 13, 2006 | By Stephen Hunt

Posted on 04/19/2006 10:56:14 AM PDT by girlangler

By Stephen Hunt The Salt Lake Tribune

Janet Lane - who on Monday got in trouble with a 3rd District Court judge for having too many dogs - was rearrested Tuesday because of yet another pet-related crime. Two years ago, Lane allegedly "dog-napped" a neighbor's registered golden Labrador retriever and paid a veterinarian to neuter it. Lane then dropped the Lab off in the night at a county animal shelter. Lane, 45, was charged with criminal mischief, a class A misdemeanor, in June 2004, but had never appeared in court. She was arrested Tuesday on the outstanding warrant and spent the night in jail. The Lab's owner, Yvette Brimhall, of Herriman, said Wednesday she was stuck with her own vet bills because "Duke" was not provided with a neck cone and injured himself by gnawing at the fresh surgical wound. The dog required emergency surgery. Furthermore, Brimhall said, she and her husband lost potential fees they could have charged for Duke's services as a purebred stud. Lane is a well-known advocate for spaying and neutering pets who has spent thousands of dollars sheltering homeless animals and getting them fixed. But Brimhall said Lane had no right to steal and neuter her dog. "It's not for her to decide," Brimhall told The Tribune. "And how could she drop our dog off without the proper protection? He could have died. I don't see that as a humane act." On Monday, Lane had appeared in court to be sentenced for having five more dogs than the two-per-household allowed by Herriman city. Four months earlier, she had pleaded guilty to three misdemeanors. Judge Stephen Henriod was shocked to learn Monday that Lane had not gotten rid of the extra dogs. He told her she should have shot the extra dogs rather than come to court in blatant violation of the law, and he sentenced her to 180 days in jail. The judge was vilified by animal lovers for making the dog-shooting comment. But he apologized at a Tuesday hearing, insisting he was trying to make a point with Lane and meant no harm to her dogs. Because Lane's friends had meanwhile taken her surplus dogs to a shelter, Henriod said she could be released from jail. But jailers discovered the outstanding warrant in the neutering case and she remained behind bars until Wednesday afternoon. Lane's next court date on that case is April 25 before Judge Paul Maughan. The alleged dog-napping occurred on March 2, 2004, when Lane took Duke to a Salt Lake City veterinarian, according to the charges. A camera at Salt Lake County Animal Control Services caught her dropping the dog at the shelter that night, and recorded the license number of her van. Meanwhile, Brimhall had contacted Lane and other neighbors looking for Duke. She said Lane - who knew Duke - twice denied any knowledge of the dog's whereabouts. Two days later, Animal Services called to say they had identified Duke from his implanted chip, and said the dog had apparently suffered a botched neutering. Lane eventually admitted she was the culprit, but told investigators the Brimhalls were "not completely blameless" because their dog was running loose, according to court documents. Brimhall said Lane typically walks a half-dozen unleashed dogs. And Lane's own female dogs are not spayed, Brimhall said, which is an attraction to male dogs. "I think she's baiting dogs," Brimhall said. But Cheryl Smith, director of Wasatch Humane, called Lane a "long-time responsible dog rescuer" who fosters for shelters, cares for homeless dogs and is "saving animals [and] serving our community." Smith wants Henriod removed from the bench for his dog-shooting comment and is urging pet lovers to file complaints with Utah's Judicial Conduct Commission. shunt@sltrib.com


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: animal; animalrights; botched; coocooforcocopuffs; dog; doggieping; neuter; neuteredparagraphs; nutjob; oops; thief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2006 10:56:20 AM PDT by girlangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; SJackson; billhilly; proud_yank

Yikes,

What happened to my paragraphs?

Ping


2 posted on 04/19/2006 10:58:32 AM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
Let me give you a hand with that.

Janet Lane - who on Monday got in trouble with a 3rd District Court judge for having too many dogs - was rearrested Tuesday because of yet another pet-related crime.

Two years ago, Lane allegedly "dog-napped" a neighbor's registered golden Labrador retriever and paid a veterinarian to neuter it. Lane then dropped the Lab off in the night at a county animal shelter.

Lane, 45, was charged with criminal mischief, a class A misdemeanor, in June 2004, but had never appeared in court. She was arrested Tuesday on the outstanding warrant and spent the night in jail.

The Lab's owner, Yvette Brimhall, of Herriman, said Wednesday she was stuck with her own vet bills because "Duke" was not provided with a neck cone and injured himself by gnawing at the fresh surgical wound. The dog required emergency surgery.

Furthermore, Brimhall said, she and her husband lost potential fees they could have charged for Duke's services as a purebred stud.

Lane is a well-known advocate for spaying and neutering pets who has spent thousands of dollars sheltering homeless animals and getting them fixed.

But Brimhall said Lane had no right to steal and neuter her dog.

"It's not for her to decide," Brimhall told The Tribune. "And how could she drop our dog off without the proper protection? He could have died. I don't see that as a humane act."

On Monday, Lane had appeared in court to be sentenced for having five more dogs than the two-per-household allowed by Herriman city. Four months earlier, she had pleaded guilty to three misdemeanors.

Judge Stephen Henriod was shocked to learn Monday that Lane had not gotten rid of the extra dogs. He told her she should have shot the extra dogs rather than come to court in blatant violation of the law, and he sentenced her to 180 days in jail.

The judge was vilified by animal lovers for making the dog-shooting comment. But he apologized at a Tuesday hearing, insisting he was trying to make a point with Lane and meant no harm to her dogs.

Because Lane's friends had meanwhile taken her surplus dogs to a shelter, Henriod said she could be released from jail.

But jailers discovered the outstanding warrant in the neutering case and she remained behind bars until Wednesday afternoon. Lane's next court date on that case is April 25 before Judge Paul Maughan.

The alleged dog-napping occurred on March 2, 2004, when Lane took Duke to a Salt Lake City veterinarian, according to the charges. A camera at Salt Lake County Animal Control Services caught her dropping the dog at the shelter that night, and recorded the license number of her van.

Meanwhile, Brimhall had contacted Lane and other neighbors looking for Duke. She said Lane - who knew Duke - twice denied any knowledge of the dog's whereabouts.

Two days later, Animal Services called to say they had identified Duke from his implanted chip, and said the dog had apparently suffered a botched neutering.

Lane eventually admitted she was the culprit, but told investigators the Brimhalls were "not completely blameless" because their dog was running loose, according to court documents.

Brimhall said Lane typically walks a half-dozen unleashed dogs. And Lane's own female dogs are not spayed, Brimhall said, which is an attraction to male dogs.

"I think she's baiting dogs," Brimhall said.

But Cheryl Smith, director of Wasatch Humane, called Lane a "long-time responsible dog rescuer" who fosters for shelters, cares for homeless dogs and is "saving animals [and] serving our community."

Smith wants Henriod removed from the bench for his dog-shooting comment and is urging pet lovers to file complaints with Utah's Judicial Conduct Commission.

3 posted on 04/19/2006 10:59:26 AM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

Heh... this is why I only post excerpts when I post articles.


4 posted on 04/19/2006 11:00:07 AM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug; Calpernia; tet68

A ping for dog lovers


5 posted on 04/19/2006 11:00:15 AM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

I knew a guy whose car was stolen and later recovered. The thief had installed new shock absorbers.


6 posted on 04/19/2006 11:00:32 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Ignore the drive-by media. Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
Janet just doesn't have a firm grasp of how you do these things.
You don't just go out and do it yourself... You get local or state government to do it for you!

The second-hand-smoke laws are a perfect template!

7 posted on 04/19/2006 11:02:19 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909; girlangler; Flyer; technochick99; sinkspur; 88keys; DugwayDuke; sissyjane; ...
Ping!


Other articles with keyword "DOGGIEPING" since 12/29/04

8 posted on 04/19/2006 11:02:39 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Thanks,

Not sure why that happened, there were paragraphs there when I posted it.


9 posted on 04/19/2006 11:08:49 AM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
The Paragraph Monster ate them.

Take warning, FReepers: your paragraphs could be next.

10 posted on 04/19/2006 11:32:34 AM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
"And how could she drop our dog off without the proper protection?"

My vet has NEVER asked for ID... except when I write her a check.

11 posted on 04/19/2006 11:35:51 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

A Vet's Story

Being a veterinarian, I had been called to examine a ten-year- old dog named Belker. The dog's owners, Ron, his wife, Lisa, and their little boy, Shane, were all very attached to Belker and they were hoping for a miracle.

I examined Belker and found he was dying of cancer. I told the family there were no miracles left for Belker, and offered to perform the euthanasia procedure for the old dog in their home. As we made arrangements, Ron and Lisa told me they thought it would be good for the four-year-old Shane to
observe the procedure. They felt as though Shane might learn something from the experience.

The next day, I felt the familiar catch in my throat as Belker's family surrounded him. Shane seemed so calm, petting the old dog for the last time, that I wondered if he understood what was going on. Within a few minutes, Belker slipped peacefully away. The little boy seemed to accept Belker's transition without any difficulty or confusion.

We sat together for a while after Belker's death, wondering aloud about the sad fact that animal lives are shorter than human lives. Shane, who had been listening quietly, piped up, "I know why."

Startled, we all turned to him. What came out of his mouth next stunned me. I'd never heard a more comforting explanation.

He said, "People are born so that they can learn how to live a good life -- like loving everybody all the time and being nice, right?" The four-year-old continued, "Well, dogs already know how to do that, so they don't have to stay as long."

Live simply. Love generously.
Care deeply, Speak kindly.
Leave the rest to God.


12 posted on 04/19/2006 11:36:57 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

LOL. I had a woman friend in NY whose ugly, rusted out, bright yellow, really crappy Chevy Cavalier station wagon was a health hazard and visual blight was stolen, driven for a couple of weeks and later found a few blocks from where it was stolen with several thousand additional miles on it.

Any reasonable person would have driven this wreck directly to the scrap yard.

The car was sooooo cheap,.....How cheap was it?,....It was so cheap it didn't even have a passenger side mirror. It was so cheap it didn't even have a cigarette lighter.

I loved it when she would go to meet her stock broker son at fancy restaurants for dinner and valet park the thing.


13 posted on 04/19/2006 11:40:24 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Now THAT is an odd story :)


14 posted on 04/19/2006 12:47:29 PM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
registered golden Labrador retriever

There is no such thing. It is either a golden retriever, a yellow lab, or it is not registered with any registry I know of.

susie

15 posted on 04/19/2006 1:14:01 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

LOL I hate when that happens!
susie


16 posted on 04/19/2006 1:14:21 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: girlangler

If you have ANY html in the post you have to put the paragraph code (a p inside carrots) or a break (br inside carrots). Otherwise it all runs together. Took me awhile to realize that, so you're not the lone ranger.
susie


17 posted on 04/19/2006 1:15:53 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; girlangler
Just so this is perfectly clear:

Carrots:

Carets:

< >

18 posted on 04/19/2006 3:32:47 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Oh no, are you making fun of my spelling???? 8-0
susie


19 posted on 04/19/2006 3:42:50 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
Who me?

I'd hate for somebody to try to post paragraphs like this:

Put useless written matter here

20 posted on 04/19/2006 3:58:44 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson