Posted on 04/19/2006 9:43:23 AM PDT by N3WBI3
Open source software advocate Eric S. Raymond is reporting that his name and copyright information for a bit of MIT-licensed code called the GIFLIB library are included in the end user license agreement of a Microsoft application called Expression 3.3.
Expression is a vector and pixel-based image manipulation application originally created by Creature House, a software production company acquired by Microsoft in 2003. The newest release of Expression runs only on Windows XP, whereas previous versions were also compatible with the Macintosh platform.
Raymond says GIFLIB was originally written by Gershon Elber, whose name is also mentioned in the EULA, for DOS. ESR picked it up and ported it to Unix, adding several features and writing some docs before "passing the baton" to the current maintainer, Toshio Kuratomi. "When Unisys started to jump salty about the GIF patents in the mid-1990s," Raymond writes, "I handed the project off to a maintainer outside U.S. jurisdiction, Toshio Kuratomi." Kuratomi has added a patent-avoiding version of GIFLIB called libungif.
Expression uses GIFLIB to read and write GIF images, but Raymond points out that his little library is included in lots of applications. "If you use open-source software that handles either of the two most popular raster-image formats, it is rather likely that you rely on my code every day," he writes. "Yes, that includes all you Firefox and Netscape and Konq and Safari users out there."
Raymond says he doesn't regret licensing the code under terms that would allow even Microsoft to freely use it. "I think empowering everyone is a far more powerful statement than empowering only those I agree with," he writes. "By doing so, I express my confidence that my ideas will win even when my opponents get the benefit of my code."
Microsoft didn't respond to requests for comment in time for publication.
They obviously didn't steal it though, even though you attempted to claim that they did. Now you're reduced to calling me names, yet again.
Please post exactly where I said they stole the code, troll.
Please also post anywhere in this thread where I said they didn't include the necessary attribution in those places where they use BSD code, as required by the BSD license.
I already did, you said they lifted it, when in fact they bought it. Get the facts straight, for once, and you and I might actually get along. But right now it's me constantly correcting you, and you resorting to insults.
Arguing semantics is another one of the troll's specialties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.