Posted on 04/19/2006 4:37:00 AM PDT by MindBender26
Breaking overnight from Chris Cummo at ABC GMA:
Case against at least one Duke defemdant unraveling fast.
Defendant Seiligman went to bank ATM while rape supposedly happening.
12:02 Time stamped photos show girl arriving. Girl leaves, comes back, call friends on cell phone does other things. 12:19 Seiligman calls cab dispatcher 12:24 Seiligman takes cab to bank miles away, uses ATM card (photos show it is him.) 12:42 after walking back to dorm, Seiligman uses security card to enter dorm. Does not leave.
Also, Seiligman was never interviewed by cops. DA seeking reelection simply took "Dancers" word that he raped her.
Let's say a witness saw a crime committed at a school by a bunch of students. I assume that it would be ok for the witness to look through a school yearbook to see if she could pick out anyone.
Is this different from this case?
I assume the difference is that in the above scenario that if the witness picked out anyone in the yearbook that she would also have to pick him out of a lineup. I don't think that happened in this case.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12388575/Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for April 18
RITA COSBY, HOST: Good evening, everybody at home. I am coming to you live right now from the Durham County courthouse in Durham, North Carolina, where just moments ago, we learned of a new search of the dorms at Duke University. Police went back to the Duke dorm room where some of the lacrosse players live and continue as they look for clues in that dorm. This comes after two of the Duke lacrosse players were charged with rape, sexual assault and also kidnapping. And late today, the district attorney a third arrest may be on the way. Plus, in my exclusive interview with, second dancer who was there the night of the alleged assault told me she wants justice.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think that if charges are filed, it wont be -
I hate to use a legal word, but erroneous. It wont be an erroneous charge.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
----
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: She was talkative and friendly and smiling, and definitelywe talked for several minutes, you know, normal conversation. We were getting to know each other. She was fine. She was absolutely fine.
COSBY: Did she seem that she had been on drugs or drinking?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Not at all. She did not seem like that at all.
COSBY: Are you surprised that theyre saying that, Look, maybe she arrived, you know, banged up and bruised?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Well, I mean, like I said, I just didnt notice anything. There was nothing overtly banged up or bruised about her, or I would have noticed it.
COSBY: How much of a contrast was her behavior from when she arrived to when she left?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: She was very different. She was different from the person that I met in the beginning of the night.
COSBY: A 180?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes. At least.
COSBY: So you make the first 911 call. She has to be physically carried into the car by some of the young men. Is she speaking or saying anything, at this point?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Not really. She was very out of it. She wasshe wasthere was almost no communication, period, and no communication could have occurred in her condition.
COSBY: You have not spoken to the accuser since that night?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No.
COSBY: Since you left her at Krogers?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Thats right.
COSBY: Do you want to talk to her now?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I mean, I have no reason not to want to. Im sorry for what happened to her and...
COSBY: Do you feel guilty?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I dont want to feel guilty because, of course, I didnt know what was going on. She was going through that while Im, you know, so close, of course, you know, I feel something. Of course, I feel something. And then you also feel, you know, Why did it happen to her and not me?
(END VIDEO CLIP)
I got the impression that he was stunned that Nifong had the nerve to present it to the Grand Jury because it was so crappy.
I was at Duke today guys. I know some people there and some people in the Media.
I have been told unconfirmed (UNVERIFIED) things from the start by the same people and they have all turned out to be true. 2nd Dancer was the source of the 911 call,
Accuser's name & partial criminal record, fact that the 2nd dancer lied to authorities and then later recanted.
So DON'T READ any farther if you want to know UNVERIFIED information. Look away now.
It must have been hard to share those experiences. Thank you.
He said she brought it over there about 11 a.m. on the 14th, after she left the hospital.
Of course, he said a lot of stuff.
Who will release the next DNA results? The DA, since he ordered the tests?
I'm thinking the longer we go without a statement, the worse it is for the prosecution.
You know, w/the team sitting around drinking beer and waiting for the dancers to show up, any number of them would have presumably used the bathroom. So even if a hair or pubic hair from any of them is found on Crystal, who was also in that same bathroom, it would prove nothing.
That's what I thought; she may have been driving without a license and didn't want to get caught.
I wonder if anybody examined HER car.
Big bags under his eyes. He also looks ashen-faced.
I don't see a confident man.
I think you're exactly right; I think he got his votes Monday when he got those indictments; they got what they wanted: heads on spikes.
But......
Poll: Nifong Has Highest Unfavorable Rating in DA Race
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=local&id=4092036
These gals must be really third string. First and second grade 'talent' rate a 'minder' going along to ensure nobody gets out of line. Cold to talk about another human like that but in the world of sleaze, it's all about the money. If they were doing one on one's, there's no pretext. These ladies were out of their league.
However, let's look at this timeline again. I had read one post where a neighbor saw little princess sitting on the back porch from 1220 to 1230.
12:03:57 Photo of both strippers leaving room (0:02:41)
12:07:00 Seligman makes cell phone call (0:03:03)
12:09:00 Seligman makes another cell phone call (0:02:00)
12:11:00 Seligman makes another cell phone call (0:02:00)
12:14:00 Seligman makes cell phone call for cab (0:03:00)
12:19:00 Seligman enters cab 1.5 blocks from house (0:05:00)
12:24:00 Seligman uses Wachovia Bank ATM (0:05:00)
12:30:12 Photo of AV on back porch going through purse (0:06:12)
12:30:47 Photo of AV on back porch apparently smiling(0:00:35)
12:31:26 Photo of AV apparently stumbling on back porch stairs (0:00:39)
12:37:58 Photo of AV lying down on back porch (0:06:32)
12:41:00 Photo of AV in stripper #2's car (0:03:02)
Using the neighbor's statement that little princess was on the back porch between 1220 and 1230, that leaves 1203 to 1220 for the assault to have occurred. This would mean that had Seligman been present during the assault, he would have called for a cab 4 times during the assault. Somewhere in the victim's statement would have to be something like - "While I was being assaulted, one of the men kept using his cell phone."
A photo of little princess on the back porch at 1230 substantiates her presence there according to the neighbor.
You're trying to be rational again, Carolinamom.
I do get irritated when I hear the TV lawyers refer to "lawyering up" as if that was a sign of guilt.
If I was wrongly accused of a crime, you would be damned sure I would not open my mouth until I had a lawyer.
These guys are not rapists, but they definitely are louts.
Yeah, but you got to remember, when you're young, stupid and drunk, that kind of stuff is funny $hit. Of course, that was before knowing how things would turn out . . .
I caught it from you! lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.