To: Asceticon
The fact that she couldn't identify them earlier is actually evidence of just how drunk/high she was that night and how unreliable she is as a witness.Is rape of a drunk woman something other than rape? I'm not sure what your point is.
8 posted on
04/11/2006 8:37:27 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
Is rape of a drunk woman something other than rape?How could there have been a rape if there is no DNA.
Nada. None.
12 posted on
04/11/2006 8:42:13 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
To: Alter Kaker
Are you saying you are convinced of their guilt without trial?
To: Alter Kaker
Rape of a drunk is still rape; indeed it's a special catgegory of non-forcible rape. However, if she was dead drunk that night there's a good chance her intoxication would have made it impossible for her to identify anybody for any reason. In other words, it profoundly undermines her credibility as a witness, just as wearing a blindfold would.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson