[BurbankKarl]

I think she has a case, if she made the payments.

[JamesP81]

I think she has a case, if she made the payments.

I don't know about that. The fact that prosecutors routinely delay trials so that they can run the defendant out of money in attorney's fees (which is a good argument for a loser-pays system in criminal law as well as civil law, btw) I can see why she's doing it.

[Howlin]

No way. He already got all the money he was suppose to get.

And, btw, she denied access to that house to Sharon Rocha through her attorney; she took responsibility for it when she did that.

Too bad for her.

[Canadian Outrage]

Why would she have a case if she voluntarily made these payments to protect SCOTT's half? Neither Laci nor her family asked Jackie Peterson to pay the mortgage. If you voluntarily pay someone's give someone some money, you can't come back later and say it is a loan!! At least that's the way I see it.