[demkicker]

I'd say the ex-wife's made out very well. And I can almost guarantee she didn't entirely use the $5,750 PER MONTH as "child support" and "day care."

Johnson may be a jerk, but he's ALREADY paid this woman a bloomin' fortune for the privilege of knowing her.

Geeze, what a stingy gut you are! The sob agreed to that amount in 1997 when his daughter was eight or nine years old, and he was a multi-millionaire. There is no indication of what he paid before then.

His child should be allowed to live comfortably. And $5750.00 a month isn't that generous considering child support is based on income. This woman gave him a break by not taking his sorry ass to court years ago. I hope she gets the best lawyer his money can buy and gets his payments quadrupled + has to pay for college, car and anything else she's done without.

The jerk rejects his daughter and now wants to sue to get some of his money back? He doesn't want to buy her a friggin computer? D*ckhead is too good a word for this sonofabitch.

[JennysCool]

Read the rest of the thread. There are some good legal reasons why Johnson may be taking this action.

[PzLdr]

And here I though child support was based on the requirement to assure the child's survivability. Apparently, if your Mom hits it right, it's an entitlement to "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous". Don't think so. And in excess of a million buck should support a child quite nicely, until she saves some money, maybe gets a part-time job, and starts paying for her own stuff, like a computer, a second hand car, student loans for college; ASSUMING, of course, that none of the $1,250.00 a week he laid out [without computing the daycare]made its way into any savings account.

[maine-iac7]

Whole ball of wax!