Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: demkicker
And here I though child support was based on the requirement to assure the child's survivability. Apparently, if your Mom hits it right, it's an entitlement to "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous". Don't think so. And in excess of a million buck should support a child quite nicely, until she saves some money, maybe gets a part-time job, and starts paying for her own stuff, like a computer, a second hand car, student loans for college; ASSUMING, of course, that none of the $1,250.00 a week he laid out [without computing the daycare]made its way into any savings account.
77 posted on 03/29/2006 2:29:32 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: PzLdr

Good grief, if you think $69,000.00 a year is equavilent to Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous money, you need to sober up. What do you want to bet that he's paid much, much more for his other children who happen to live with him? Sorry, but putting a nice roof over his kid's head, feeding, clothing and paying for extra-cirricular activites, braces, medical bills,etc. all adds up and is his obligation. And yes, the fact that he's a multi-millionaire who has rejected contact with his daughter makes a big difference. Chances are her mother's had to provide counseling for her because he is such a jerk.


81 posted on 03/29/2006 2:41:50 PM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson