Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Proud_USA_Republican
According to the documents, Johnson first agreed in 1997 to pay Roszell $5,000 per month in child support for Heather, and another $750 in monthly day care expenses, the Daily News said.

I'd say the ex-wife's made out very well. And I can almost guarantee she didn't entirely use the $5,750 PER MONTH as "child support" and "day care."

Johnson may be a jerk, but he's ALREADY paid this woman a bloomin' fortune for the privilege of knowing her.

17 posted on 03/29/2006 1:01:05 PM PST by JennysCool (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JennysCool

$5000 a month in unreportable child support...that's not bad. Plus day care expenses. That's a sweet deal. Randy has been paying all along as well. Don't see how this makes Randy a bad guy....He has acknowledged his obligations, has been responsible to his child.


25 posted on 03/29/2006 1:08:00 PM PST by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JennysCool

Never married. Story doesn't really say whether or not it was a fling or something longer.

But, he does seem to say that he's done being worked over for cash by the woman. And, $60K a year in child support is a pretty tidy sum.


26 posted on 03/29/2006 1:08:08 PM PST by misterrob (Islam is a hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JennysCool

He hasn't paid her a bloomin fortune for knowing her. He is paying to help a girl abandoned by her father (only because he is forced to apparently). If the mother does not see to it that the money is used that way, then she is a jerk too.


27 posted on 03/29/2006 1:09:36 PM PST by jbp1 (be nice now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JennysCool

". . . for the privilege of knowing her."

KNOWING HER!!??

Ummmm.... the relationship seems to have been a bit closer than that, unless, of course, you're speaking King James biblically.

Creepy.


42 posted on 03/29/2006 1:19:43 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JennysCool
I'd say the ex-wife's made out very well. And I can almost guarantee she didn't entirely use the $5,750 PER MONTH as "child support" and "day care."

Johnson may be a jerk, but he's ALREADY paid this woman a bloomin' fortune for the privilege of knowing her.

Geeze, what a stingy gut you are! The sob agreed to that amount in 1997 when his daughter was eight or nine years old, and he was a multi-millionaire. There is no indication of what he paid before then.

His child should be allowed to live comfortably. And $5750.00 a month isn't that generous considering child support is based on income. This woman gave him a break by not taking his sorry ass to court years ago. I hope she gets the best lawyer his money can buy and gets his payments quadrupled + has to pay for college, car and anything else she's done without.

The jerk rejects his daughter and now wants to sue to get some of his money back? He doesn't want to buy her a friggin computer? D*ckhead is too good a word for this sonofabitch.

71 posted on 03/29/2006 2:19:09 PM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson