[jennyp]

And the skull is assumed to be a hominid, something that cannot even be proven to have existed.

What great science.

Hominids cannot be proven to have existed??? That's an intriguing statement. Care to try your hand at deciding which of the fossils in post 50 belong in the ape-kind vs. the human-kind? Could it be possible that any of those are actually transitionals related to both kinds?

[VadeRetro]

... the fossils in post 50 ...

Hah! PROVE any of them really existed!

</Whacked-out Luddite Mode>

[fortheDeclaration]

And the skull is assumed to be a hominid, something that cannot even be proven to have existed. What great science. Hominids cannot be proven to have existed??? That's an intriguing statement. Care to try your hand at deciding which of the fossils in post 50 belong in the ape-kind vs. the human-kind? Could it be possible that any of those are actually transitionals related to both kinds?

Oh, come on now!

There is not one so-called 'transitional' skull that can be proved to be a transitional skull.

It is either a human skull or an animal one.

And that is why the scientists always use words like 'assume' and 'possible' when discussing them.