Posted on 03/20/2006 2:27:38 AM PST by goldstategop
"V for Vendetta," which opened on Friday, combines all of the celluloid lefts paranoid fantasies Christian conservatives in charge of a brutal regime, the war-on-terrorism as an excuse for the suppression of civil liberties, homosexuals harassed and killed by conservative Christians, a pedophile priest (who works miter-in-had with the regime) and an attack blamed on terrorists thats really a right-wing conspiracy.
All thats missing is a Halliburton connection. For that, well have to wait for "V The Return."
"V" opens in Britain circa 2020. America has succumbed to plague, civil war, and chaos. (Bushs fault, no doubt.) The UK is ruled by a fascist regime with strong Christian overtones the partys slogan is "Strength through Unity; Unity through Faith." Its symbol is a stylized cross, and its enforcers are a quasi-religious police.
As the film opens, Britains most popular commentator is explaining how Americas fall was ordained by its embrace of "degeneracy," as flecks of saliva fly from his mouth.
The Brit Reich is headed by Chancellor Sutler played by a cadaverous John Hurt (who looks like a cross between Hitler and Kate Moss). Hurt is incapable of delivering his lines unless hes: A) Screaming B) Sneering or C) on the verge of a cerebral hemorrhage.
In the England of "V," free speech has been crushed. Conformity is ruthlessly enforced. Dissidents and non-conformists are hunted down and eliminated. Torture is a routine. Medical experiments are performed on undesirables. And "1984" indoctrination is ubiquitous.
Enter the mysterious "V" a knife-throwing martial-arts master in a Guy Fawkes mask.
The movie projects the 17th century Englishman as a prototypical freedom fighter. In reality, Fawkes was a Catholic conspirator who tried to murder James I and most of Britains nobility by attempting to blow up Parliament in the famous Gunpowder Plot of 1605. His objective wasnt constitutional democracy but a return to Catholic rule. But, then, Hollywood never did have much of a sense of history.
Thats only the beginning of "Vs confusion. One of the characters is a closet homosexual talk-show host (portrayed by British actor Stephen Fry), who shelters Natalie Portman on the run from the authorities.
In his Crypt of the Banned, Fry shows Portman a Koran. "Are you a Muslim?" Portman innocently asks. No, Fry replies, but I appreciate the beautiful illustrations and poetry therein. Does he also appreciate the perspective of the religion-of-peace on the love-that-dare-not speak-its-name? Were there German Jews in the 30, who really dug those snappy SS uniforms?
The only reference to Islam has to do with beauty and poetry. "V" has other targets on its radar screen. In terms of bashing the Right and demonizing Christians with "V," Hollywood is completely in character.
Need a clichéd bad guy? Call central casting for a stock lecherous priest, hypocritical evangelical, repressive preacher or sadistic nun. Whether now or in the past, committed Christians are regularly portrayed as characters who should be committed fanatical, hypocritical, cowardly, avaricious and lustful. Think "Kingdom of Heaven," "King Arthur," "Saved," "The Magdalene Sisters," "Priest," The Order," "Dogma," "Stigmata," and the movie version of "The DaVinci Code," coming out in May.
As much a staple as the evil Christian is the unprincipled, power-mad conservative politician, general, or businessman.
Starting with "Dr. Strangelove" and "Seven Days In May," proceeding to "The Manchurian Candidate" (both the 60s original and the recent remake), "Dreamscape," "The American President," "The Contender" (with Gary Oldman doing his Bob Dole impression), "Bulworth," "The Day After Tomorrow" (where the destruction of America in a global climate catastrophe is blamed on a conservative vice president opposed to the Kyoto Treaty) well, you get the picture.
"V for Vendetta" is distinguished by envelope-pushing, combined with an unapologetic glorification of terrorism.
The title character (who begins the movie by blowing up the Old Bailey and ends with the demolition of Parliament) is a noble soul a courageous, long-suffering, philosophical bloke, who appreciates jazz, Renaissance paintings, weepy old movies, and high-cholesterol cooking.
This is Hollywoods romanticized take on terrorists far removed from the reality of Koran-happy sadists who plant nail-packed bombs in restaurants frequented by families with young children.
The slogan of "V for Vendetta" is: "People shouldnt fear their government. Governments should fear their people."
In the real world, beyond the pages of comic books (where "V" originated), theres no shortage of governments that prey on their people, and people who live in gut-wrenching fear of their rulers places like Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Syria, and the Peoples Detention Center of China.
Here are governments with gulags, medical experiments performed on dissidents, tanks rolling over demonstrators, torture cells and thought-control.
Beijing sells the organs of executed prisoners. Kim Jong Il deliberately starves his subjects while pursuing nuclear weapons. Iran puts out contracts on novelists. When he was in power, Saddam Husseins idea of a night on the town was watching a live man being fed into a plastic shredding machine.
When was the last time Hollywood made a big-budget film about the agony of existence in one of these nightmare states? I know; its a real brain-teaser.
The few include "Red Corner" (where Chinas "justice system" is not portrayed sympathetically) and "Die Another Day" (even here, the bad guys arent the rulers of North Korea, but rogue elements therein scary thought).
While they carry on about Bush being behind the 9/11 attacks and using the war on terrorism to advance his totalitarian plans, much of Hollywood has the warm and fuzzies for the most corrupt and brutal tyrannies on earth.
Sean Penn flew to Baghdad prior to the U.S. liberation and posed next to a picture of Saddam. Steven Spielberg (whose "Munich" posits moral equivalence between Palestinian assassins and Israeli agents out to get them) once remarked, "The best seven hours I ever spent was actually with Fidel Castro." (Given the quality his recent films, he might be right.)
And, lest we forget, Jane Fonda (star of "Monster-In-Law," now playing on cable), who traveled to Hanoi during the Vietnam War to make propaganda broadcasts, told an audience at the University of Michigan (1970): "I would think that if you understood what communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees, that we would someday become communists."
After the war, Fonda called Joan Baez a liar for charging the Khmer Rouge with genocide. (In reality, the Killing Fields were a reclamation project.) The U.S. POWs who said they were tortured at the Hanoi Hilton also liars, according to Fonda.
Her ex-husband, Ted Turner whos gone duck hunting with Castro has remarked that "communism is part of life on this planet. And thats okay with me."
In the 1980s, Ed Asner bought "medical supplies" for the FMLN, the Marxist guerrillas who wanted to turn El Salvador into another Cuba.
The aptly named Vanessa Redgrave is a member of the British Workers Revolutionary Party. In her younger days, the mummified Marxist may have shared a bed with the red gravedigger of Cuba. And, in 1978, she teamed up with Fonda to make "Julia," glorifying yet another Red lover: Lillian Hellman. Warren Beatty got off playing John Reed (who thought Lenin was the messiah) in "Reds."
Need I continue? Hollywood has a lot of credibility when it comes to lecturing us on tyranny about as much as Ted Kennedy does on drunk driving, Bill Clinton on marital fidelity, and Robert Downey Jr. on a drug-free America.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Well, my opinon of Natalie Portman just collapsed about 50 notches. I believe this also got top marks at the box office, didn't it?
This sickens me.
Just more crap from Bizarro World. They won't be getting any of my money for this garbage.
I noticed that cross in the previews. Then I decided no way was I going to see this movie.
In the title it should read "V is for Vile". Are these people really that stupid or are they really trying to spread lies and create another communist nation. I really think Jane Fonda is a spawn of Satan. When she started lying about are troops during Vietnam, Things started spiraling downward. These idiots should be shot for treason. I am really scared for the youth of today, cause they put more emphasis on what these entertainment yahoos talk or sing about then what their own parents teach them.
The author of the comic book series, Alan Moore, has disavowed this film and refuses to take money from the proceeds.
Regards, Ivan
And one more thing we would be alot worse of if we weren't blessed with Pres. Reagan
Does that mean he disagrees with the propaganda in the film?
Yes, he's actually a conservative. He wrote the series when he was afraid of a far-left socialist takeover of Britain.
Regards, Ivan
the partys slogan is "Allah Aakabar".
This is supposed to Britian in 2020 isn't it?
Couldn't he not allow them to show this film because it based on his comic book?
No, that was the decision of the comic book company in question.
Regards, Ivan
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Also "V" in the comic book series is not a hero. He's an anarchist and a nihilist who is out to destroy.
The idea, I believe, was to show what lengths of hopeless man could be driven to by a (socialist) dictatorship.
Regards, Ivan
Of course their probaly some people in this world that would love to punish others for their sins, like say adultery. Oh wait, never mind they are called Muslims.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
That's the way I look at it. WierdHolly needs to quit lecturing us, and give us something we'd care to plunk good money down to see.
I haven't been to a theatre in years, and from what I hear about rude people and cell phones ( no cell phones the last time I bought a ticket ), all I have missed was annoyances.
Watching the "Lord of the Rings" series on TV actually stirred an interest in seeing it on the big screen- then, I thought better of it- wait 'till we get a bigger TV, and watch the DVD's.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
There are many (neo?)conserviatives here who think one should view a movie (support it with their dollars) before passing judgement. I always considered this logic to be tragically flawed and self-defeating.
I'm stuned, simply stuned. I caught an infomercial on M-TV about this movie. Their take was that his comic book series was in response to Magaret Thatcher's reign of conservative terror. I just can't fathom that such a solid source of information as M-TV would botch something as simple as a movie preview. /sarc off
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.