Stingray: Conservative Christian News and Commentary
Posted on 03/11/2006 9:17:48 PM PST by DallasMike
The Boston Globe is reporting on a battle between Usenet and the movie industry. Usenet is actually an separate entity from the Internet and is basically a collection of tens of thousands of newsgroups ranging from aardvarks to zebra. Picture files are also widely available and it remains one of the most readily available sources of pornography. With the advent of high-speed downloads and readily available video and music compression software, Usenet has become a haven for downloading pirated movies. I once worked with a guy who would sometimes download 2 or 3 movies a night. The Boston Globe has this to say:
Late last month, the Motion Picture Association of America filed its first-ever lawsuits against Internet companies that help people download illegally copied films over the Usenet. The association says that the companies, NZB-Zone, BinNews, and DVDRS, provide a Google-like search service for Usenet, one that lets its users find thousands of pirated films, including recent hits such as ''King Kong," ''The Chronicles of Narnia," and ''The 40-Year-Old Virgin."
I'm not a big fan of Hollywood and the outrageous prices that are charged for mediocre movies these days, but distributing and downloading pirated software, movies, and music is both illegal and immoral.
Stingray: Conservative Christian News and Commentary
"I swear I've never stolen a picture from the Internet..."
This is just as inane as suing p2p file sharing networks for providing an avenue to potentially distribute illegally acquired media. I'm not endorsing disregarding copyright law, but this isn't going to do anything.
What's next "MPAA sues Al Gore for creating internet"
Most Internet Service Providers offer Usenet access to their subscribers. Some of the larger ones use their own server farms to host the files. Won't it be interesting to see what happens when it becomes more widely known that ISPs are not only providing access to illegal movies, software and porn, but are also storing the files on their own company servers? Who's got the deeper pockets, the downloaders or the providers? Who's more culpable, the downloaders or the providers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.