Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

They can sue though, else they would say, in writing, "we will never sue anyone, ever" while in fact they reserve that right. If Microsoft took Open Solaris and released it with a few changes and stole a lot of their business you boys would have a caniption, and be ready to sue. But let the Chinese, and you have no problem.


232 posted on 03/15/2006 10:11:21 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle

"caniption"

er...that's conniption.

I guess we must be transferring dictionary technology to China, too.


234 posted on 03/16/2006 5:33:45 AM PST by FLAMING DEATH (And now, for something completely different: www.donaldlancow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle
They can sue though, else they would say, in writing, "we will never sue anyone, ever"

Anyone can sue for anything, no matter how baseless. But the easy defense is the CDDL said, in writing, that the developer had a license against patent infringement from Sun. It's really that simple, there's no conspiracy from Sun to trap developers.

And what's with all this garbage about a fork anyway? It's meaningless to the discussion. Red Flag Linux is not a fork, it is merely a distribution. Even if in some bizarro world you were right about the patent risks of forking, the Chicoms don't need to fork in order to release their own branded version of Open Solaris just like Red Flag.

As I told you, Sun is actively promoting this in China, trying to overturn Linux in that market. You like Open Solaris, but think Linux is communist. Hypocrite.

If Microsoft took Open Solaris and released it with a few changes and stole a lot of their business you boys would have a caniption

No problem at all as long as they follow the license. Free is free for anyone that agrees to abide by the license, including Microsoft, including China, including Free Republic and DU (both of which run on free software under at least two different open source licenses).

An OSI-accepted license (thus can be called "open source") cannot discriminate against specific people or groups of people, nor can it discriminate against specific uses of the software.

236 posted on 03/16/2006 6:26:01 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson