Mr. Dell opens up about Desktop Linux

Desktop Linux ^ | Mar. 07, 2006 | Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

[Golden Eagle]

Sun only shared their source because of linux too. Thanks to guys like you, the commies keep getting more and more free stuff. But of course you don't care, so long as you get some free stuff too. For some people, that's just all that life is about, what can they get next just by sticking their hand out.

[Golden Eagle]

I already linked your post history twice, which shows you posting on all the latest Linux threads which of course all turned out to be lies. Most guys could find their history on their own, but not the flamer, LOL. If it doesn't involve insults or cluelessly posting lies, he can forget it.

[FLAMING DEATH]

"I already linked your post history twice, which shows you posting on all the latest Linux threads which of course all turned out to be lies."

So, the criteria for lying is posting on Linux threads?

Wouldn't that make you a liar too?

Of course, you ARE a liar, but I've pointed out your lies by linking directly to specific posts that you've made. I've requested you do the same, but you repeatedly refuse to do so.

"Most guys could find their history on their own..."

I know what my history is, and that's not what I'm asking you for, and quite frankly, it's amusing how difficult it is for you to comprehend this. I'm asking for specific posts of mine that you say are lies. I'm not asking for my posting history, because I already know where to find that. I'm asking you to specify WHICH of my posts you think are lies, especially those dealing with Google OS, Linux deployment at IBM, and Dell making Linux desktops, the latest three subjects about which you said that I lied. You know, the same stuff I've been asking you to show me for weeks now. Why will you not back up your lies with any sort of proof?

Of course, I expected this. You lie about everything, even (especially) me. And, you have to keep lying to cover your tracks about your lies. Then you lie about covering your tracks.

Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the truth, Turkey?

[Golden Eagle]

I've been on the Linux threads pointing out all the lies, which are now exposed for everyone to see, and you've been there attacking me for it just as you are now. They were all BS, just as I indicated from the start, which really "burns you up" LMAO!

Rage on if you want, no one is surprised a burning dude from hell would act this way, nor is it about to stop me from exposing the next batch of lies you boys attempt to push around here.

[FLAMING DEATH]

Where are the posts that prove what you say about me? I'd accept just one. That'd be dandy. So, when do I get it?

P.S. - Thought you were leaving?

[FLAMING DEATH]

For those who don't yet know...

Golden Eagle is a pathological liar and hypocrite. Here are examples:

Here, he complains that Cedega's not free:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=115#115

and then, mocks another user for suggesting that Cedega be free:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=134#134

then complains that Linux is free:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1530486/posts?page=40#40

and here he is, recommending free Solaris:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21

Here he is, criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?q=1&&page=101#115

and copping out when challenged about Windows inability to run Linux apps:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=118#118

Here he is, recommending Solaris, which doesn't run Windows apps:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21

...and Apple, which doesn't either:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1573697/posts?page=9#9


Here, he's criticizing others for namecalling:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1584107/posts?page=29#29

And here he is, namecalling:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1583531/posts?page=61#61


Here's where he refers to Dell "systems":

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=35#35

Then denies his own words:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=137#137

then blames me for it all, saying I should have reminded him of his own

words: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=165#165


Then, here's where he makes more false accusations of ME:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=90#90

and here's where I ask him to prove I said the things he accused me of:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=92#92

And refuses to provide a link to MY posts (he just linked to my history

instead): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=95#95

And fails again to prove what he says:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=99#99

And yet again, repeating the accusations, but failing to provide proof:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=122#122

And now, where his "proof" is something I didn't even post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=125#125

and where he has the nerve to ask another poster to back up what they say

with specific examples, despite the fact that he refused to do so for me:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=255#255

and here is where he demands that yet someone ELSE provide a link to prove

what THEY said:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1568848/posts?page=68#68

and here is where he claims he will admit mistakes, despite the fact that he

hasn't admitted this one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592494/posts?page=43#43


Here he is claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel

developers: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=49#49

And here he is claiming no one knows how many kernel developers work for Red

Hat: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=77#77

and yet, he denies that he said hundreds, yet again (21st paragraph):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=131#131

And here he is getting nailed for it yet again:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=132#132

and again:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=137#137

and claiming that I never proved that he was wrong about the number of kernel

developers at Red Hat:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=134#134



Here's where he hijacked the Open Source Ping List, and the ensuing

discussion: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1571222/posts?page=8#8


Here he is ridiculing another poster for using bold fonts to make a point:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1493462/posts?page=130#130

And here he is using bold fonts to make a point:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=106#106


Here he is defending Microsoft's contributions to Planned Parenthood:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1492595/posts?page=22#22

Here is a Linux thread with only one post by GE (notice how pleasant and

peaceful): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1500664/posts?q=1&&page=1

Here is a Linux thread where GE stayed and trolled (well beyond 280 posts,

totally off the topic. No insults before he showed up, as with many of his

threads. He has stated multiple times that he was leaving, yet he keeps

posting, because he's a last word freak):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=1#1


Here he is saying that he's leaving the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=127#127

and here he is, many days and over 100 posts later, still posting:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=281#284

[Golden Eagle]

Oooooh, I said I was leaving a thread then came back after you slandered me.

Oooh even worse, there's a question about how many Linux programmers work at Red Hat. Which of course isn't even the issue.

The issue remains, yet the flamer refuses to address, is that all those Red Hat programmers give their software to the Cinese who rename it "Red Flag" and resell it across Asia without a dime back to the US. Not just China either, every country in the world.

I don't mean illegal copyright infringement. I mean legally, they make these copies and strip our name off completely, something that guys like this flamer completely agree with, so they attack me for pointing it out to those who never heard of such a thing.

LOL this flamer dude is the biggest joke I've ever seen on here. "Oh horrors, Gold Eagle came back to a thread to spank me some more" LMAO!

[FLAMING DEATH]

"Oooooh, I said I was leaving a thread then came back after you slandered me. "

No, you said you were leaving several days and many posts ago, but you can't because you're a last word freak. And, as for slander, everything I've said, I've documented. Too bad you have yet to do the same.

"Oooh even worse, there's a question about how many Linux programmers work at Red Hat. Which of course isn't even the issue. "

You're right. The issue is how you lied about it on multiple occasions, which makes me wonder why you think anyone should listen to you.

"LOL this flamer dude is the biggest joke I've ever seen on here. "Oh horrors, Gold Eagle came back to a thread to spank me some more" LMAO!"

Yeah. You took me to the woodshed when you whined about me "slandering" you. Sissy.

BTW, did you find examples to back up your lies about me yet?

[Golden Eagle]

I see you're still too afraid to even touch the subject of free technology for China Cuba Iran and all those other countries that are standardizing on the goodies they get via "open source" like Linux. Of course no one is surprised since you're not even capable and don't even understand the terminology or even the difference between your master Stallman's license and his faq. Oh thatls right, you did make one pitiful attempt at it, but your commie side came glarring out when you started blasting the richest man in the world for daring to try and sell software. That's just not the commie way is it Flamer.

[FLAMING DEATH]

And I see you're still not going to back up your accusations of me with specific examples. So, as far as I'm concerned, you're still a liar. When you establish a shred of credibility for yourself, you might get people to take you seriously and have a reasonable discussion. When you lie, then dodge, then lie again, you deserve to continually have your dishonesty exposed to everyone here.

[FLAMING DEATH]

P.S. - thought you were leaving?

[Golden Eagle]

I've already linked your posting history several times, which clearly shows you posting on the Linux threads that all turned out to be lies, yet you refuse to admit because you don't even understand the simplest terminology such as what a "desktop" computer is LMAO.

No you're too busy trying to put up a smoke screen to cover up the free transfer of technology to countries like Iran Cuba and North Korea, which you still refuse to admit as well. So how does it feel to be a commie suckup? Looks like it really burns you up ROFL.

[FLAMING DEATH]

"which clearly shows you posting on the Linux threads that all turned out to be lies"

Post one.

That's all I've been asking for these past weeks. Just post one thing I've said that you believe to be a lie, Turkey.

Why is that so hard?

[Golden Eagle]

The whole threads were lies, even the author of the articles with the dell rumors even admitted it. And if you boys post any more threads that are obvious lies you can expect I will shoot them down just as quickly, whether you whiners call me turkey or not, all that really does is further cement the giant "L" already firmly planted on your foreheads.

[FLAMING DEATH]

"The whole threads were lies"

Nice try. You just admitted that you can't point to a specific statement of mine that is a lie, out of a whole thread of lies?

You know, I may have only been born yesterday, but it was EARLY yesterday.

You keep dodging, spinning, circling, and dancing around, all to keep from being confronted with your own lies.

"even the author of the articles with the dell rumors even admitted it"

Great. I neither posted the article nor commented on it directly. How does that make me a liar? Why don't you just admit you screwed up again, rather than dig yourself even deeper into your hole?

"And if you boys post any more threads that are obvious lies you can expect I will shoot them down just as quickly,"

You can't even show me where I've started a tech thread. You can't.

And I challenge you once more to give an example of one statement I made on one of those threads that was a lie. Please. If the "whole threads were lies", then it shouldn't be hard to pick out a particularly untruthful statement that I made.

And, to finish up, the perfunctory:

Why no examples / thought you were leaving?

[Golden Eagle]

LOL, don't blame me if you're not smart enough to make a relevant post on the tech threads you so want to be a part of. You might however be correct that all your posts on those threads actually were nothing more than your typical insults of those like myself who were debunking the lies, but you were in fact there just as I showed, once again proving yourself to be not much more than a stark raving madman. But rant on if you want, it's good for everyone to see how Stallman's disciples act when they're exposed.

[theFIRMbss]

Anger Antisocial Behavior Anxiety Appetite Disturbances Avoidance Body Image Problems Compulsions Confusion Cravings Deceitfulness Delusions Denial Depression Dissociation Euphoria Fatigue Fears Flashbacks Grandiosity Grief Hallucinations Histrionics Hyperactivity Identity Confusion Impulsiveness Intoxication Jealousy Learning Difficulties Mania Memory Loss Mood Swings Movement Problems Nonsense Obsessions Oddness Physical Complaints and Pain Panic Paranoia Psychosis Religious Preoccupations Self-Esteem Problems Self-Mutilation Sexual Performance Problems Sexual Preoccupations Sleep Problems Sloppiness Speech Difficulties Stress Suicidal Thoughts Trauma

[Golden Eagle]

Yep, but with a name like "FLAMING DEATH" we shouldn't be surprised.

[FLAMING DEATH]

Ha ha!

[FLAMING DEATH]

"debunking the lies"

Which lies? You still haven't told me.

Would that be the lie about hundreds of Red Hat kernel developers, or the lie about your reference to Dell "systems"?

BTW, you leaving?