So, the criteria for lying is posting on Linux threads?
Wouldn't that make you a liar too?
Of course, you ARE a liar, but I've pointed out your lies by linking directly to specific posts that you've made. I've requested you do the same, but you repeatedly refuse to do so.
"Most guys could find their history on their own..."
I know what my history is, and that's not what I'm asking you for, and quite frankly, it's amusing how difficult it is for you to comprehend this. I'm asking for specific posts of mine that you say are lies. I'm not asking for my posting history, because I already know where to find that. I'm asking you to specify WHICH of my posts you think are lies, especially those dealing with Google OS, Linux deployment at IBM, and Dell making Linux desktops, the latest three subjects about which you said that I lied. You know, the same stuff I've been asking you to show me for weeks now. Why will you not back up your lies with any sort of proof?
Of course, I expected this. You lie about everything, even (especially) me. And, you have to keep lying to cover your tracks about your lies. Then you lie about covering your tracks.
Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the truth, Turkey?
I've been on the Linux threads pointing out all the lies, which are now exposed for everyone to see, and you've been there attacking me for it just as you are now. They were all BS, just as I indicated from the start, which really "burns you up" LMAO!
Rage on if you want, no one is surprised a burning dude from hell would act this way, nor is it about to stop me from exposing the next batch of lies you boys attempt to push around here.