Haha! Keep the laughs coming!
Let me explain what just happened, because you obviously don't understand. No one broke down, Turkey...I pointed out the stupid flaw in your apples to oranges comparison, then went on to blow your feeble contention out of the water, playing by your rules and beating you. Of course, you're not bright enough to realize what just happened.
But I did notice that you ignored my request for instructions to run XMMS under Windows XP. Why's that?
XMMS? Why in the world would I want to slow my computer down with that junk?
Quit hiding from the discussion, that being your claim Linux is easy to use, while I continue to prove it's not, whether it be a beginner being unable to find proper install procedures, to Linux vendors themselves being unable to convert their own systems. "Linux" is all one big confusing mess. Just as Michael Dell keeps saying, for years now.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1935309,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594
"People are always asking us to support Linux on the desktop, but the question is, 'Which Linux are you talking about?'" Dell asked.
"If we say we like Ubuntu, then people will say we picked the wrong one. If we say we like and support Ubuntu, Novell, Red Hat and Xandros, then someone would ask us, 'Why don't you support Mandriva?'
"It's not that there are too many Linux desktop distributions," Dell said, "it's that they're all different, they all have supporters and none of them can claim a majority of the market.
"If you look at DistroWatch, you'll see zillions of these distributions. Which one should we do?"