Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FReeper Canteen ~ Tech Tuesday: Email Tax ~ Would you pay for email guarantees? ~ 07 March 2006
EFF.org | The Canteen Crew

Posted on 03/06/2006 5:36:12 PM PST by MoJo2001


Canteen Computer Resource Center
Click on the logo to transport to our Canteen Resource Center!!
 

 

Technology Tuesday
 
GummyIII will return next week (if possible), but she's busy saving the world from a chocolate shortage! It's an important job we wouldn't trust to just anyone. Definitely not something for MoJo.

----------------------

Since many of our Troops use AOL, we wanted to know what you thought about AOL's plans for folks to pay for GoodMail. Is it something worth fretting over, a new enterprising an idea, or another way for which companies can milk money out of consumers already using free email services?


 

What's This About?
In February 2006, AOL announced that it would accept payment for incoming emails. For these certified emails, it would skip its usual anti-spam filters and guarantee delivery for cash. Our coalition believes that the free passage of email between Internet users is a vital part of what makes the Internet work. When ISPs demand a cut of "pay-to-send" email, they're raising tollbooths on the open Net, interfering with the passage of data by demanding protection money at the gates of their customers' computers.
Read More
 

 

What's this controversy all about?

AOL has proposed the adoption of a system called CertifiedEmail, provided by Goodmail Systems. Under this pay-to-send system, affluent mass-emailers who are willing to pay AOL the equivalent of an "email tax" would get to bypass AOL's spam filters and get guaranteed delivery to the inboxes of AOL customers.

Everyone who can't afford to pay AOL's "email tax" - including charities, small businesses, civic organizations, and even families with mailing lists - will have no guarantee that their emails will be delivered. If other companies follow AOL in adopting pay-to-send systems, the Internet will become permanently divided into two classes of users - those who can afford to pay for guaranteed delivery and everyone else left behind with unreliable service.

Though billed in the media as an anti-spam and anti-phishing measure, AOL's pay-to-send system will fail on both scores.

AOL's "email tax" will cause great harm to the free and open Internet that many of us take for granted. The Internet is a revolutionary force for free speech, civic organizing, and economic innovation specifically because it is open and accessible to all Internet users. With a free and open Internet, small ideas can become big ideas overnight. AOL's move to introduce a pay-to-send system is a danger to this openness, and we urge them to reconsider.

------------------------------------------

Which brings us to the next question: Is this something to get hyper over? Or is it a real concern? Would you pay for the service?

 

What say you?


 

 

Disclaimer:
Do you ever wonder why companies always put disclaimers at the bottom of their pages? And then they expect you to read the *fine print* as well? Well, this is done for a reason. It allows them to make up a bunch of unecessary rules and BS that no one will read nor thinks about reading. As a matter of fact, the disclaimers are really *Dating Ads* that those anonymous computer geeks put out to the general public. It's a way to get them a date via their disclaimers. It's risk free and also a sure way to ensure that their name will appear in the ad somewhere. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, then you totally understand the ideas about disclaimers. They're useless for the most part.

 

 


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: aol; computers; email; military; technology; troopssupport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-364 next last
To: HiJinx; MoJo2001

Speaking of the internet.....


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591390/posts


61 posted on 03/06/2006 7:45:07 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; tomkow6; LUV W; All

Well UK Telegraph reporting that Russia may break and go against EU and US suport Iran on getting nukes Gee no suprise there eh

Also Aussie Age wire report thattttt UK may withdrawel troops out of Iraq by middle of 2008 no timetable YET


62 posted on 03/06/2006 7:45:42 PM PST by SevenofNine (I'd rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

Yup, just saw that.

I don't think we're considered a public forum, since JimRob routinely kicks people off...

Nor are we really anonymous...but...

Congress hates an unregulated entity.


63 posted on 03/06/2006 7:46:44 PM PST by HiJinx (~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: tomkow6
While you are reasonably sure MoJo did it,
she's totally sure and very confident about your guilt Tom........

*sigh*

mmmmm
64 posted on 03/06/2006 7:48:50 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Nor are we really anonymous

Huh. That's what YOU think. I am ACTUALLY an 85 year old man didja know that huh? REALLY! Ask MoJo! She's talked to me! ....just kidding. :)

65 posted on 03/06/2006 7:49:01 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
So refreshing to see innocent people around..

heheheh
66 posted on 03/06/2006 7:50:14 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: EsmeraldaA

Dat's me!

INN-o-Cent!




(got a bridge thingy for sale, too...ya interested?)


67 posted on 03/06/2006 7:52:22 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: EsmeraldaA; tomkow6; MoJo2001
she's totally sure and very confident about your guilt Tom........

I dunno 'bout that...us guys fix things, we don't break 'em...unless they need to be broke!

68 posted on 03/06/2006 7:52:37 PM PST by HiJinx (~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001; tomkow6
I forgot to ping you to this Diva....;o)

While you are reasonably sure MoJo did it,
she's totally sure and very confident about your guilt Tom........

*sigh*

mmmmm
69 posted on 03/06/2006 7:53:15 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
LOL!

I already have one in red and one in yellow (apparently that's a lot)
70 posted on 03/06/2006 7:55:55 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Shoot, and I thought you were really Bo Derek
or
someone else like that.
71 posted on 03/06/2006 7:56:43 PM PST by HiJinx (~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
You couldn't be further from the truth if you tried! :) Wow! Wrong-O!
72 posted on 03/06/2006 7:57:46 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; tomkow6; MoJo2001
Sure...........

Like I didn't hear that one before!

hehehe
73 posted on 03/06/2006 7:57:50 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EsmeraldaA

Ya gots TWO bridges????

One in red and one in yellow?

Whoooooooooooooooooo boy. SOMEONE was a great salesperson!


74 posted on 03/06/2006 7:58:19 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001
Would you pay for email guarantees?

No. If they start charging across the boards, I'm done with email.
75 posted on 03/06/2006 8:00:23 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

Really? Conservative, mature, intelligent...where'd I go wrong?


76 posted on 03/06/2006 8:01:04 PM PST by HiJinx (~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
HEY!
The looked pretty..
77 posted on 03/06/2006 8:02:58 PM PST by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

The second and third ones were a tad off. ;)


78 posted on 03/06/2006 8:06:05 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: EsmeraldaA

OK! OK!

I myself, have bought a vacuum cleaner (eons ago) from ... why am I saying this on an open forum????? .... a door to door salesman.

WORST piece of junk I've ever owned in all of my life..


79 posted on 03/06/2006 8:07:26 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tomkow6; LUV W; All

Well report off UK Times is report that Vlad of Russia has sign new law that would permit the Russian miltaty shoot down terrorist hijack plane or ships

DAMN Russia is cold


80 posted on 03/06/2006 8:07:38 PM PST by SevenofNine (I'd rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-364 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson