Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/26/2006 5:55:00 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

Another valuable use for aluminum foil head protection. Thanks for keeping psychos occupied with the Danger of Cell Phones, and thus less able to annoy us in other ways.


2 posted on 02/26/2006 5:59:32 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; Right Wing Professor

When i was in radio, they always told us to limit our time in the transmitter room due to the hazards of RF. Now people are putting RF to their heads. I have no doubt cell phones could cause health problems, but you'll never hear about it because the massive class action lawsuit would be simply unimaginable.


3 posted on 02/26/2006 6:17:37 PM PST by JennysCool (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
What a steaming pile.

The research community, based on over half a century of work, has found only a single credible link between nonionizing radiation and cancer -- joule heating. In short, you cook yourself. This occurs only when energy absorption exceeds tissue's ability to dissipate energey (circulation, perspiration, etc). FCC RF exposure limits, which are engineered into every service and application, reflect this limitation with a large safety margin.

Every few years, some crackpot will come along and claim to have discovered some new correlation, and invariably sloppy epidemiology is to blame. One should be very, very, VERY critical of such claims.

4 posted on 02/26/2006 6:47:37 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

for later


5 posted on 02/26/2006 7:47:31 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

I did researches on this for my Master degree a few years ago. To be honest, non-thermal effects seem to exist if epidemiological studies are to be trusted, and one model of mechanism has been proposed and I that it is numerically replicable in my studies.

The results are about 3% elevation of risk.


8 posted on 02/27/2006 10:10:36 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

No. Next!


9 posted on 02/28/2006 10:42:36 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson