Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: N3WBI3
could you highlight some of the ways its more friendly?

Basically, it doesn't contain Stallman's rabid anti-business philosophy. For example, you could modify some Mozilla code and integrate it into your closed-source, for-sale application, but you would only have to license your modifications to the Mozilla code under the MPL. Your own code can remain proprietary.

Going the other way, IIRC you could make a closed-source module linked to the Mozilla application and sell the whole thing under the conditions above.

42 posted on 02/23/2006 9:11:25 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
it doesn't contain Stallman's rabid anti-business philosophy.

Maybe, but most "open source" is based on Stallman's license, to the tune of 75 percent or so I'm sure you know.

43 posted on 02/23/2006 9:20:33 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: antiRepublicrat
you would only have to license your modifications to the Mozilla code under the MPL. Your own code can remain proprietary.

Souds a bit like the LGPL..

45 posted on 02/23/2006 9:23:12 AM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson