Of course the ref from Pittsburgh didn't have a preference for which team won. That's what I was saying.
No you're implying sarcastically that he had bias. Funny for a guy that likes to accuse others of spinning just how fond you are of Clintonian word games. It was a clear cut obvious case of interference that should be called every time it happens, the ref attempted to throw the flag immediately but missed. Those are the visually obvious FACTS. You implication of bias is just sour grapes whing.