Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
I think the official blew calls in both directions and I'm not worried about that.

You Pittsburgh spinmeisters should go into politics. But really, just saying that the officiating didn't favor one side over the other-----no matter how many times you say it-----doesn't make it so.

173 posted on 02/08/2006 9:59:23 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Junior_G
But really, just saying that the officiating didn't favor one side over the other-----no matter how many times you say it-----doesn't make it so.

Of course just saying that doesn't make it so. It is so, independent of whether anyone says it. Truth is truth, and its veracity is not dependent on one or more proclamations as such.

176 posted on 02/08/2006 10:01:52 AM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Junior_G
But really, just saying that the officiating didn't favor one side over the other-----no matter how many times you say it-----doesn't make it so.

Of course, the converse is also true. Saying that the officiating did favor one side over the other doesn't make it so, either.

The fact is, the only truly bad call that went against the Seahawks was the "low block" call against Hasslebeck. I consider that less egregious than the fact that the referee apparently doesn't know what the "down by contact" rule is, according to his incorrect overturning of Hasslebeck's fumble in the second half.

179 posted on 02/08/2006 10:04:11 AM PST by kevkrom ("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Junior_G

There's no spin about it. What about the catch and fumble that probably would have been recovered by the Steelers but was incorrectly called an incompletion? What about the illegal block in the back laid on Ben after his second INT that went unflagged? Bad calls went against the Steelers too. And accusing people of spinning doesn't change the facts.


187 posted on 02/08/2006 10:12:46 AM PST by discostu (a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Junior_G
But really, just saying that the officiating didn't favor one side over the other-----no matter how many times you say it-----doesn't make it so.

And it's just easier believing an officiating conspiracy in the most watched sporting event in the world....right?

<\occamsrazor>

205 posted on 02/08/2006 10:31:16 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson