Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariposaman
Why wasn't this defensive interference?





26 posted on 02/07/2006 6:36:09 AM PST by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: bikepacker67

Your obsession with this topic borders on the frightening.


30 posted on 02/07/2006 6:38:40 AM PST by Mariposaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67
***Why wasn't this defensive interference?***

Uh.. maybe because it was a running play?

48 posted on 02/07/2006 6:51:45 AM PST by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

Very nice stills showing a clear cut case of offensive pass interference. The right arm extends pushing off, pass interference, no catch, no TD, eat 10 yards from the line of scrimage and try again.


66 posted on 02/07/2006 7:14:45 AM PST by discostu (a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: bikepacker67

Because it was offensive interference. Use your eyes. Frame three show a stiff arm to the chest and frame 4 shows the d-back had been pushed backwards while the receiver gained seperation. And it was all done directly in front of the back judge! Just a Stupid move by the receiver! That is not the spot on the field to try that move. It's as dumb as speeding past the police station.


94 posted on 02/07/2006 7:37:43 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson