Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddle E. Squat

I agree, the call could have gone either way, and either way both sides could have insisted they got robbed. Was the call a blatantly biased one that gave the Seahawks the game though? No way-if it was such an intentionally wrong call, let's face it, reasonable people would not be disagreeing about it. It's a matter of an inch or two, seen by the human eye in a flash of an instant, and not even visible enough on replay to conclusively say one way or the other.

In any case, don't you think Bill Cowher goes for it and gets the TD on fourth and 1/2 inch in the Super Bowl? Based on past experience I'd say that's a 99% probability.

Same thing with the offensive pass interference. If Seattle apologists would be honest with themselves and imagine that play as a Steeler on offense and Seattle on d, they know damn well they'd be SCREAMING for that OPI call.

Look, I don't mind people questioning this call or that call, but to say it was some kind of concerted effort is ridiculous-these are split second calls, there's not time to think "Ok, that wasn't really a penalty but I really want the Steelers to win"-these are not OBVIOUS mistakes like the overturned Polamalu interception.


161 posted on 02/06/2006 10:22:08 PM PST by busstopsindetroit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: busstopsindetroit
Was the call a blatantly biased one that gave the Seahawks the game though? No way

I agree 100%.

162 posted on 02/06/2006 10:23:59 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (Why is Tupperware bulletproof?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson