Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Game's third team upstaged Steelers, Hawks
ESPN ^ | 2/6/06 | Michael Smith

Posted on 02/06/2006 8:53:10 AM PST by highlander_UW

DETROIT -- Three weeks ago, after the Steelers held on to upset Indianapolis, Joey Porter was unhappy about the overturning of Troy Polamalu's fourth-quarter interception that could have sealed the win much earlier. Believing that deep down the league preferred Peyton Manning and the Colts to win, Porter publicly criticized the game officials, asking them not to "take the game from us."

Well, the Steelers can call it even now, as the officials who performed well enough throughout the season to earn the privilege of working Super Bowl XL performed Sunday as though they were trying to make it up to the Steelers by giving them the game -- not just any game, but the biggest game. And, yes, this time the other guys, the Seahawks, cried conspiracy, only not quite as loudly as Porter.

"You know, that's what happens when the world is against you," one Seahawk said after the 21-10 loss at Ford/Heinz Field. "No one wanted us to win. They wanted Jerome Bettis to win and go out a hero, and they got it."

Seattle had its share of goats: in particular, tight end Jerramy Stevens, who dropped four balls, and kicker Josh Brown, who missed two field-goal attempts. Almost to a man, the Seahawks pointed the blame finger at themselves for converting only one of three red zone attempts (when they had been the best in the league in that area, scoring a touchdown on 71.7 percent of their trips inside the 20-yard line); for allowing Ben Roethlisberger to improvise and complete a 37-yard pass to game MVP Hines Ward to the 1; for giving up a 75-yard touchdown run to Willie Parker; and for getting beaten by a trick play on Antwaan Randle El's pass to fellow receiver Ward for a touchdown, a first in Super Bowl history. If you read between the lines, though, they pretty much spelled out in bold letters that they had plenty of help in handing Pittsburgh its fifth Lombardi Trophy.

Namely, the boys in black and white.

"Those things are out of our control," Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck said of the three major penalties that helped change the game completely. Not saying the outcome of the game would have been any different, but for sure it would have been a different game. "That's the way [the officials] called them," Hasselbeck continued. "The Steelers played well enough to win tonight, and we didn't. They should get credit. It's disappointing, it's hard, but what are you going to do?"

Here's what referee Bill Leavy's crew did, point blank: It robbed Seattle. The Seahawks could have played better, sure. They could have done more to overcome the poor officiating. We understand that those things happen and all, but even with all the points Seattle left on the field, there's a good chance the Seahawks would have scored more than the Steelers if the officials had let the players play.

In the biggest game of the year, the biggest game in sports, even, the officials were just a little too visible. In that regard, the Super Bowl provided a fitting conclusion to a postseason packed with pitiful performances by the game's third team. There were incorrect down-by-contact rulings in both NFC wild-card games; a touchdown that could have gone either way and should have gone the other way -- in favor of Tampa Bay -- in the Bucs' loss to the Redskins; the Patriots got no love in Denver in being hit with a bogus pass interference penalty and not catching a break on Champ Bailey's fumble at the goal line that looked as though it could have been a touchback; and, of course, the Polamalu play.

Still, what happened to the Seahawks wasn't the same as, say, New England going into Denver and playing badly (five turnovers) on top of the bad calls. Seattle gained almost 400 yards and turned it over just once.

You see, you can spend weeks -- and we did; two, in fact -- analyzing and dissecting matchups and giving each team the edge in certain areas and trying to figure out how the game is going to play out, but the two things you can't account for are turnovers and officials. The latter were the X-factor Sunday. Edge: Steelers.

It actually was a fairly clean game from a penalty standpoint, without a whole lot of yellow on the field -- 10 accepted penalties between the teams. Seven were against the Seahawks, though, a team that tied with Indianapolis for the second-fewest penalties (94) in the regular season. But those calls against the Seahawks stuck out like the Space Needle on the Seattle skyline.

Consider: The Seahawks lost 161 yards to penalties when you combine the penalty yards (70) and the plays the flags wiped out (91). By halftime alone, when it trailed 7-3, Seattle had had 73 hard-earned yards and a touchdown eliminated.

Hasselbeck hit Darrell Jackson with an apparent 16-yard scoring pass in the first quarter, but the play came back when Jackson was called for offensive pass interference. It was a touch foul. Jackson extended his arm, yes, but both players were fighting for position, and he didn't create any separation by doing so. It was like a referee calling a hand-check in a key moment of Game 7 of the NBA Finals.

The Seahawks had to settle for three instead of seven.

Still, that was early, and that one didn't change the game as much as did a holding call against Sean Locklear early in the fourth quarter with Pittsburgh leading 14-10. That one wiped out an 18-yard catch by Stevens that would have taken the ball to the 1. Locklear supposedly held Clark Haggans, so instead of first-and-goal at the 1 and the chance to complete a 98-yard touchdown drive and take a three-point lead, Seattle faced first-and-20 at the 29.

Three plays later, Ike Taylor picked off a Hasselbeck pass, and Hasselbeck went low to make the tackle on Taylor's return and was called for a 15-yard personal foul for a low block. The Steelers set up shop at their 44. That one right there made no sense.

Pittsburgh likes to run its trick plays in the middle of the field. Boom! Four plays later, from Seattle's 43, Randle El took a reverse and threw a sweet strike on the run to Ward. It was 21-10, and that was all she wrote. Everyone knows how important it is to play Pittsburgh with a lead or with the score tied. The Steelers don't lose when they're up by 11.

Eleven just so happens to be the total points taken away by bogus calls. Some penalties meant points; others meant field position. A holding call in the second quarter negated Peter Warrick's 34-yard punt return that would have started Seattle in Pittsburgh territory.

By contrast, the Steelers might have gotten a break on Roethlisberger's 1-yard touchdown plunge on third-and-goal in the second quarter. Leavy reviewed the play under the booth's orders, since it occurred inside the two-minute mark, and while still photos of an airborne Roethlisberger showed that the ball might have broken the plane of the goal line, he landed short of it and reached the ball over. It was close. Head linesman Mark Hittner didn't seem so sure of it, hesitating before signaling touchdown.

"I don't think he scored," Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren said.

It was that kind of evening for the Seahawks, who represent a town where residents know all too well that when it rains, it pours. If having what seemed like 90 percent of the 68,200 in attendance waving Terrible Towels wasn't enough to make Seattle feel as though it was playing on the road, the officials called it as though the Seahawks actually were.

Pittsburgh capitalized on its opportunities. And guys like Bill Cowher, Ward, Dan Rooney and The Bus are all very deserving of a championship -- and it's nice to see them win one -- but it would have been better had it not happened like this. It's like the Seahawks said: Not taking anything away from the Steelers, but keep it real.

"We had a touchdown taken away from us, the first one we scored," said Hasselbeck, who was measured in his words but clear in his frustration, "and then we had the ball at the 1-yard line, they called a penalty on us. That was unfortunate."

"I thought they were offside [on the play Locklear was called for holding]," center Robbie Tobeck said. "I thought we had a free play on because they had two guys come across. You know, that's the game. In a game, there's situations you have to overcome, and all night long we didn't do a good job of overcoming those things, and that's something we've done all year."

In the offseason, 31 teams will be back at the drawing board, evaluating what they need to do to knock off the Steelers in the fall. After the postseason they just had, Mike Pereira and the NFL's crew of officials would be wise to take a long, hard look at themselves. It's a real shame when, on the game's biggest stage, the major players aren't players at all. We saw too much of the third team in Super Bowl XL and not enough Seahawks and Steelers.

Michael Smith is a senior writer for ESPN.com.


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: bowl; callawaaaaaambulance; football; nfl; notnews; referees; seahawks; steelers; super; superbowl; wrongforum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-260 last
To: beyond the sea

Yep...I was born and raised in Western PA ('Pennsyltucky') and it remains my family's center of gravity...I don't consider myself so much a football fan as I do a Steeler's fan. When the Steeler's are out of it, football season's over for me until the following year (same thing with the Pirates). It's great to see Bettis finally get his; what a class act he has been throughout his career.


241 posted on 02/06/2006 2:52:40 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

I meant you cannot BLOCK below the knee. There was a blocker H went through BEFORE he made his tackle.

You can't do that.


242 posted on 02/06/2006 3:00:44 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

I did not videotape the game.

A QB will usually go down with his back, helmet or shoulders to avoid the lower arm contact.

H went down like that, I believe, in front of the blocker to get through to the ball carrier.

You CAN'T DO THAT! Too many injuries come out of that kind of busting through a blocker.

Rules are to protect players from injuries. H would not have been injured, but the blocker certainly can be because he is NOT EXPECTING that.


243 posted on 02/06/2006 3:04:17 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Ditto to Ditto. I have said this several times earlier today.


244 posted on 02/06/2006 3:05:36 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

Should not be. Outside of their division, they should have the hardest schedule in the NFC.


245 posted on 02/06/2006 3:06:31 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
You may well be right that only the "informed" minority gets the fact that the officiating was good during XL.

The perception of the majority seems to be that it was not good. If the NFL wants to maintain credibility, that should concern them.

In the confines of a game, the calls are what they are, and the Seahawks players and coaches need only look in the mirror to see why they lost. They should then look at the Steelers to see the other part of the equation.

Bad calls are going to happen, it is part of the game. Indeed, it is interesting to ponder the reaction of Seattle fans had the key Pittsburgh plays been called back by penalty. I think the complaining would be as loud coming from Pittsburgh fans, and the Seattle fans would by and large remain smugly silent.

In the broader perspective of the sport, it is bad news when the majority of viewers perceive the officiating as poor or biased. A lot of judgment calls, like holding and interference, could be called on almost every play. It is up to the officials to judge when it is appropriate to throw the flag, and whether by good judgment, choice or chance those flags came out at critical moments, mostly against Seattle. That may well have been justified. A lot of folks seem to think that wasn't the case.

Unless the NFL is going to administer a test to see how informed a fan is before they take his or her money, it would behoove them to present a product that makes sense and seems fair even to the casual fan.
246 posted on 02/06/2006 5:20:20 PM PST by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
Just as most American citizens are relatively ignorant of what is really happening in the political world, most viewers of the Super Bowl are relatively ignorant about what is really happening on the field. The "informed" ones (as you sarcastically write) are not just in Pittsburgh, however some of us do feel a greater need to set you and the rest of the uninformed straight.

For a team that was 7-5 in November and only the sixth-best in the AFC, you boys sure fancy yourselves.

Part of the vilification you see against your team is due to the boorishness of the Steeler representatives on FR.

Just thought you ought to know that.

247 posted on 02/06/2006 5:27:49 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural
Some of them are baseball and hockey fans. We have a lot of chances to piss on them.

Yeah, like when the Islanders made a fool of the Penguins goaltender in a shootout on Saturday. By my reading, the Penguins are 12-32, with the lowest number of victories in the entire NHL.

You ain't gonna piss on ANYBODY in hockey this year.

248 posted on 02/06/2006 5:33:37 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Well, there is basketball and baseball. Pittsburgh doesn't have to win or lose anything to piss on someone else's team who wins or loses. Though I made that clear.

Pissing on others teams and others fans is a double-edged sword. Cuts both ways. Get it now? Steelers and their fans have been pissed on constantly since the Super Bowl started and it hasn't ended yet.


249 posted on 02/06/2006 5:37:55 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural
Steelers and their fans have been pissed on constantly since the Super Bowl started and it hasn't ended yet.

Could some of that have to do with the Steeler fans?

You boys ought to be happy, declare victory, and be magnanimous, instead of acting like this is the first year of a dynasty or something. It's not.

I'm a Cowboy fan, and if anybody been's pissed on, it's us. Lots of Dallas-haters out there, though the Cowboys stuff still outsells that of any other NFL team.

The best thing to do is be realistic. You won a close game, the big calls went against Seattle, and both teams played poorly. THAT is what happened yesterday.

250 posted on 02/06/2006 5:51:56 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; beyond the sea

It would appear to have to do with the fans from the other side. Or are you too blind to notice?

I think you would defend your team if so many derogatory remarks were made against it. Why shouldn't I defend my team, and why should other Steeler fans not defend their team? Steeler fans are loyal and many. They do not call us the "Steeler Nation" for nothing.

Get a clue. If you can't find one, try to buy one.


251 posted on 02/06/2006 6:04:37 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural
I think you would defend your team if so many derogatory remarks were made against it.

You won the Super Bowl. Why do you have to "defend" anything?

252 posted on 02/06/2006 6:12:13 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Too blind to notice why? Or just pretending not to know? I think it is the latter.


253 posted on 02/06/2006 6:13:24 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

OK. Keep getting beat up, if that's your choice.


254 posted on 02/06/2006 6:16:22 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777
I did not videotape the game.

I've since seen it played on the local news, and he didn't go through a blocker to get to the tackle, so it was a bogus call. The guy that jumped over him was actually BEHIND the ball carrier.

255 posted on 02/06/2006 7:37:22 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777
Should not be. Outside of their division, they should have the hardest schedule in the NFC.

Based on this years record (which is not entirely indicative of next year's abilities), I believe the ranking was 29th most difficult for the Seahawks. They play the NFC North, which includes teams such as Detroit. Of course it doesn't matter, you have to play whoever is on your schedule...not an option to change it.

256 posted on 02/06/2006 7:39:23 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

257 posted on 02/06/2006 7:39:43 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

whatever.


258 posted on 02/06/2006 7:41:59 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1
The perception of the majority seems to be that it was not good. If the NFL wants to maintain credibility, that should concern them --------- agreed.

Indeed, it is interesting to ponder the reaction of Seattle fans had the key Pittsburgh plays been called back by penalty. --------- There were a few of them, one being the real fumble by Stevens that was negated by the call.

In the broader perspective of the sport, it is bad news when the majority of viewers perceive the officiating as poor or biased. ---------- it is a problem if the fans are not wise to the rules.

A lot of judgment calls, like holding and interference, could be called on almost every play. ----------- right.

Unless the NFL is going to administer a test to see how informed a fan is before they take his or her money, it would behoove them to present a product that makes sense and seems fair even to the casual fan. --------- maybe they should. But I don't know how you do it unless the rules are rewritten. It's a very tough game to officiate.

259 posted on 02/06/2006 8:29:48 PM PST by beyond the sea (Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777

It's not a whine. The officials had a bad day.

Which normally wouldn't bother me, except that it was the Super Bowl. I expect better officiating in that setting, regardless of how bad both teams were performing.


260 posted on 02/07/2006 5:46:37 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-260 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson