Skip to comments.
Game's third team upstaged Steelers, Hawks
ESPN ^
| 2/6/06
| Michael Smith
Posted on 02/06/2006 8:53:10 AM PST by highlander_UW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 next last
To: beyond the sea
You're almost right there. But you didn't answer my question about elitism.
Tough baloney, Pittsburgh won a pretty ugly Super Bowl, but the great teams win games even when they are playing below par.
I think most would agree both teams played below their best football. I don't take issue to a team losing by being outplayed...too bad that wasn't the case in this game.
But the fact is, the game is history...weak play and horrific officiating notwithstanding. But don't expect the world to believe the Steelers won the game on their merits...it's simply not true. I wish you luck on defending the crown...going to be tough in the AFC. Seahawks apparently have another weak schedule from what I've read.
221
posted on
02/06/2006 1:42:30 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Hatteras
talk it over with the poster
222
posted on
02/06/2006 1:44:16 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: beyond the sea
post # 163 will answer your question That's silly. So if you fall down you're not allowed to reach out and tackle a player running past? If you're blocked to the ground you're not allowed to grab the runner's foot? If you're chasing and make a diving tackle it's a penalty if you get them below the legs? It sounds very unlikely to me.
223
posted on
02/06/2006 1:44:35 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Ditto; joyspring777
You can't challenge a "no-fumble" call if the whistle has blown.You are right, but somehow that ruling seems like it needs to be changed. I don't know how, but that was a fumble. The receiver even took a step and a half to progress after the "catch" before he was smacked.
224
posted on
02/06/2006 1:48:10 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: discostu
As soon as you go low on a blocker, even if you're really trying to go low on a ball carrier and the blocker is just in the way, even if the blocker avoids being hit, it's a foul.That's amazing. I've been watching football for 50+ years and never knew that.
225
posted on
02/06/2006 1:50:00 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: highlander_UW; discostu; kevkrom; Ditto
But don't expect the world to believe the Steelers won the game on their merits...it's simply not true.From Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid:
"You just keep thinkin', Butch, that's what you're good at."
;-)
226
posted on
02/06/2006 1:53:43 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: beyond the sea
I don't think it was that way until this year. They tweaked a few rules trying to cut down on injuries this year and I'm 90% sure that's one of the ones they tweaked. And it kind of bites because basically it just hoses offensive players after a turnover. Dive low and hope the guy falls down is how offensive players do most of their tackles, because they don't actually know how to tackle and that's the safest surest way for a non-tackler to get somebody down (also defenders don't actually know how to leap over guys down low and avoid a tackle so it's more effective against them). But Randal El got nailed in both the Colts regular season game and the Bengals second regular season game for basically the same thing. Stinky rule but at least they applied it evenly.
227
posted on
02/06/2006 1:53:47 PM PST
by
discostu
(a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
To: highlander_UW
228
posted on
02/06/2006 1:54:44 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: beyond the sea
The Gaza Strip District.
LMAO!! Brings to mind images of crazy Stillers fans burning down the Giant Iggle and then storming Kennywood, cans of Arn City in hand.
To: Joe 6-pack
Well, they scored 24 points. 10 counted.
230
posted on
02/06/2006 2:04:51 PM PST
by
Lexinom
To: Lexinom
231
posted on
02/06/2006 2:10:19 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
To: beyond the sea
I am going to remember all the jackasses who pissed on the Steelers victory. When their favorite team wins or loses I will be right there on their thread either telling them how much their team deserved to lose when they won, or, better yet, there to rub salt in their wounds when their team loses.
Some of them are baseball and hockey fans. We have a lot of chances to piss on them.
But they can't cange the fact that the Steelers won, no matter how much they hate the Steelers. Five Super Bowl wins and only one loss. Who can match that? Not the Cowboys. How many did SF lose? The Pats have won four, not five.
So let them keep their snide talk going. Jealousy is the most sincere form of flattery.
232
posted on
02/06/2006 2:17:39 PM PST
by
Supernatural
(All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
To: beyond the sea
Seattle's mayor sure did pay up on his bet with Bob O'Connor fast. I don't know what Pittsburgh is going to do with all this Washington state
wine.
...but where's the salmon?
233
posted on
02/06/2006 2:18:35 PM PST
by
infidel29
("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." --Benjamin Franklin)
To: Joe 6-pack
Nah, I'm not that upset. The 'Hawks have a 3 or 4 year window to make this happen.
I'm happy for The Bus and Bill Cowher. Congratulations on a great season and the championship, even if was ugly.
234
posted on
02/06/2006 2:18:50 PM PST
by
Lexinom
To: Joe 6-pack
235
posted on
02/06/2006 2:27:27 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: Supernatural
I am going to remember all the jackasses who pissed on the Steelers victory. When their favorite team wins or loses I will be right there on their thread either telling them how much their team deserved to lose when they won, or, better yet, there to rub salt in their wounds when their team loses.Don't waste your time.
236
posted on
02/06/2006 2:29:06 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: beyond the sea
237
posted on
02/06/2006 2:30:16 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
To: Joe 6-pack
238
posted on
02/06/2006 2:37:59 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: beyond the sea
You are right, but somehow that ruling seems like it needs to be changed. I don't know how, but that was a fumble. Not unless we want the Supreme Court involved. Once the whistle blows, you can't undo the call because you have no idea what would have happened next.
Look. players drop passes, miss blocks, fumble the ball, forget the snap count etc. Sometimes the officials blow it too. It's part of the game. Demanding that somehow every wrong be made right in football is as silly as thinking that our litigious legal system can make every wrong right. It can never happen.
239
posted on
02/06/2006 2:39:09 PM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: Supernatural
How many did SF lose? None. They are 5-0
240
posted on
02/06/2006 2:41:27 PM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson