Posted on 02/03/2006 8:59:13 AM PST by SunkenCiv
Archaeologica · Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · ArchaeoBlog
Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society · Archaeology Odyssey
History Podcasts · Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · post a topic
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
I wrote a paper on dendrochronolgy back in 1975 for one of my archeology courses. Very interesting topic. I don't share Mr. Keenan's lack of confidence in D-scores, though. I think it can become a useful statistical tool in this field.
If I understand dendrochronology, they are compiling--actual samples--a time schedule that will eventually be continuous all the way back, but that will vary from one region to another because climate varies from one region to another. Anatolia might have had a few good growing years while Attica was bone dry, for example, so samples could not in general be directly compared.
IIRC, that is the weakness of dendrochronology. If you do not have a means of connecting tree rings regionally, then you lose the continuum. The statistical confidence level drops and you can't piece together a reliable timeline.
That is what I was thinking. The collection for the Upper Adriatic would have to be separate from that for Tunisia. There would be gaps in each collection, and making the various collections would involve a lot of serious fieldwork. Not a small project.
Yes, regional differences do occur however, they are still useful for determining worldwide events.
"Dr Mike Baillie, Professor of Palaeoecology in the School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology at Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, is a leading expert in dendrology, or dating by means of tree-rings. In the 1980s, he was instrumental in building a year-by-year chronology of tree-ring growth reaching 7,400 years into the past."
I've read that the tree-ring records have been extended back to 10k years now.
I have also heard that there is a continuous record of sorts.
Absolutely amazing stuff. The creativity and inventiveness of human scholarly efforts never ceases to astound.
Pinging the expert.
Pinging the expert.
The tree-ring records I am familiar with are from southern California (the White Mountains) and Arizona. Didn't even know where Anatolia was until I looked it up.
The latest I have heard on the calibration:
Dendrochronologically dated tree-ring samples cover the period from 0-12.4 ka cal BP. Beyond the end of the tree-rings, data from marine records (corals and foraminifera) are converted to the atmospheric equivalent with a site-specific marine reservoir correction to provide terrestrial calibration from 12.4-26.0 ka cal BP. Source
Hope this helps.
You Turkey! :)
So will this change the dates we normally see in textbooks for the Hittite and Phrygian civilizations? It sounds like the type of discovery Immanuel Velikovsky would have liked to see.
One trouble is that (for an example from the paper) two trees growing on the same hillside but different elevations generally have quite different and unmatchable tree ring sequences, even when they are contemporaneous. There are also problems with soils, such that volcanic soils are enriched in C12, leading to plants showing false antiquity.
And without the bark, there's not even a clue about how much later the tree was cut down to make the gate. :')Do the results from the developing dendrochronology for Anatolia agree or disagree with CoD?Only the results from one Hittite site have been formally published, those from Tille Höyük on the Euphrates. These were striking. The construction of the last phase of the Tille Höyük Gateway is dated to 1101 + 1 BC, with its use lying in the 11th century BC. Yet Tille Höyük was an Imperial Hittite outpost, which on the conventional chronology would have been constructed about 1300 BC, and destroyed c. 1190 BC. The dendro-date is clearly impossible for the conventional chronology. Furthermore, the best fit for this sample (using the normal T-score statistical test) is actually in 942 + 1 BC (James et al. 1998, 41, n. 10)! An extra statistical test had to be introduced to avoid this awkward conclusion.
Peter James et al
CoD FAQ
So far, so good. Over at the New Chronology Group, we have recently come to the conclusion that the Hittite Empire ended in the reign of Egypt's Merneptah, whenever that took place, and the latest date I saw proposed for Merneptah is 885-865 B.C., less than 80 years after the 942 date you mentioned.
More like 575-564. :')
Probably so. I find the tree-ring patterns in the spruce I cut from my own yard to be hard to match when the trees are only a few yards apart.
I saw that.
[rimshot!]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.