Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: _Jim

It's my understanding that the fire might have not been as bad if the Towers had been built using asbestos.


94 posted on 02/01/2006 9:27:27 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
It's my understanding that the fire might have not been as bad if the Towers had been built using asbestos.

Asbestos was used but was stopped about 1/2 way up. After that, different fire proofing was used.

As to whether or not asbestos would have made a difference, it is hard to tell. Most of the fire proofing was blown off by the force of the impact and asbestos probably would have been as well.

98 posted on 02/01/2006 9:29:15 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Despite Popular Opinion, Tom Tancredo Does Not Support Deporting Illegal Aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
It's my understanding that the fire might have not been as bad if the Towers had been built using asbestos.
I don't know that you would have bought all that much time in this case; the aircarft coming in laterlly literally 'blew off' and blew out a lot of material that would otherwise 'protect' the building/steel from the effects of fire. Much of the sheet rock used in lieu of other 'wall' materials blew out when the jet(s) hit.
105 posted on 02/01/2006 9:32:45 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson