Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
-- The external lattice frame that was used in their construction was an innovative design element back then, and I suspect the buildings would have stood a much better chance of surviving the impact and fire if they were constructed with a standard internal column/beam frame.

That's the standard story. In Jones' work he shows the bearing capacity of the internal column structure. In fact the building structural design is more redundant than most other buildings.

43 posted on 02/01/2006 9:03:15 PM PST by Anthem (One can not lie their way to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Anthem
The external frame provided more redundancy, but it also provided more exposure to damage from external forces. I also suspect that the enormous size of the floor slabs and long horizontal distance between the core and the external frame made these floor slabs the weakest part of the structure. In a traditional building frame, it may be possible for individual sections of floor slabs to fail without bringing the entire building down -- or to at least cause the building to collapse in a slower fashion.
67 posted on 02/01/2006 9:11:44 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson