9/11 ATTACKS Avoiding the hard questions

Miami Herald ^ | Feb. 01, 2006 | ROBERT STEINBACK

[Howlin]

We must be bored.

It's really fun when we're all bored at the same time and somebody puts up a thread like this!

[_Jim]

If you pour jet fuel (again, a light kerosene) into a pan and light it, will it reach 2200o? No, it won't. And you know it. Look, I don't have to

Blissful ignorance of the other combustable materials in those buldings?

I think most sources agree that the jet fuel burned away early on, BUT provided the ignition source by which the REST of the building burned and provided the heat source that finally fatally weakened the inner stuctures and integral construction of WTC bldgs 1 and 2.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

No, it wouldn't make the whole building fall. It would have fallen off the building, leaving the rest of the building standing.

Even if we stipulated that all the arguments you present regarding the material construction of the towers, the temperature of jet fuel, and thermite explosives were correct.....WGAS?

I fail to find any of that relevant. It's chaff. All of it.

Kindly attempt to explain to us how such a conspiracy could be successfully carried out. And why.


I stand by. Amused.

[_Jim]

I guess he's gone; not going to play anymore. And I've got to go too.

[abner]

Marking for when I am awake...

_jim is the most interesting FReeper when he comes out to play.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

It's really fun when we're all bored at the same time and somebody puts up a thread like this!

Alot of names I see around all the time FR. Jointly teaching a class on Conspiracy Theory Debunking 101.

[Anthem]

I don't know. I'm making no speculation as to motive, or who is responsible. The point of this article is that the Physics professor has made a good case for the "pulling" of those buildings.

[Anthem]

--Parts of building don't just TIP off.

You haven't even looked at Jones' report, have you?

[Howlin]

He is. He just doesn't come out enough!

[Howlin]

Yes, I have. And it is BOGUS.

[Howlin]

Hey, it's what we do best. :-)

[Anthem]

-- I can melt steel in the backyard fire pit with wood.

Only with some air injection system. Busy with the bellows are ya?

[roses of sharon]

How very convenient!

More like a "good case" for a smear monger.

Bastard.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

More like a "good case" for a smear monger.

LIHOP/MIHOP Conspiracy Nut.

[Anthem]

--110 stories worth of vertical steel column standing by iteslf?

No. But we would have seen the center column coming through roof as the floors fell, and then the possibility of it tipping and falling would exist.

Jones has some mathematical models that he has submitted for peer review. They are not included in this public report. In fact he has largely eschewed publicity after the bow-tied boy on PBS pretended to interview him.

[Howlin]

You should have been here the day JFK Jr.'s plane was missing.

*Rolling my eyes*

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

I don't know. I'm making no speculation as to motive, or who is responsible. The point of this article is that the Physics professor has made a good case for the "pulling" of those buildings.

That this matter is of such importance to you suggests to me that you have, in fact, made exactly such speculations. Share your ideas with the group. Help us get to know you.

[roses of sharon]

Yes, drama queens rule in the critical thinking of this nation.

But what to expect when Oprah and the NYT bathhouse boys have been in charge for over a decade.

It's like a giant cult, what's next? Suicide bombs?

[Anthem]

--Kindly attempt to explain to us how such a conspiracy could be successfully carried out.

I offer no explanations without evidence. That's why I said, in my initial comment above, that a proper investigation would have to determine opportunity, means, and motive. First things first, clearly identify what happened. The NIST and 9/11 reports did't. The ommissions are well documented, and what's included stretches credulity.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

I don't think he likes me.