To: Anthem
No, it wouldn't make the whole building fall. It would have fallen off the building, leaving the rest of the building standing.
Even if we stipulated that all the arguments you present regarding the material construction of the towers, the temperature of jet fuel, and thermite explosives were correct.....WGAS?
I fail to find any of that relevant. It's chaff. All of it.
Kindly attempt to explain to us how such a conspiracy could be successfully carried out. And why.
I stand by. Amused.
123 posted on
02/01/2006 9:53:18 PM PST by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth; _Jim; Howlin
Marking for when I am awake...
_jim is the most interesting FReeper when he comes out to play.
125 posted on
02/01/2006 9:58:08 PM PST by
abner
(Looking for a new tagline- Next outrage please!- Got it! PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS LOST IN THE USA!)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
--
Kindly attempt to explain to us how such a conspiracy could be successfully carried out.I offer no explanations without evidence. That's why I said, in my initial comment above, that a proper investigation would have to determine opportunity, means, and motive. First things first, clearly identify what happened. The NIST and 9/11 reports did't. The ommissions are well documented, and what's included stretches credulity.
139 posted on
02/01/2006 10:23:17 PM PST by
Anthem
(One can not lie their way to the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson