I'm in!
Doesn't look like he's been zotted yet: he may be misguided instead of a troll.
My thoughts on the subject at hand:
We will not and cannot invade Iran. Not a full-scale invasion: at least not YET. I predict that around March or April, US (or Israeli) forces are going to have to lead an airstrike against Iran's nuclear facilities. If it comes to that, then the ESSENTIAL thing for us to do is make sure the border between Iraq and Iran is completely sealed and shut off. Right after the strike, Ahmadinejad and the Mullahs are going to try to send masses of Islamic militants to Iraq to disrupt as much as possible. (That and Syria are where most of the insurgents in Iraq have been coming from).
What happens after the strikes is hard to say...but of all the possibilities, at least Iran will NOT have nuclear weapons.
Oh, and the "Jew York City" comment was completely out of line, unless it was a typo.
It was purposeful, he said it twice.
He said it in the "Newt '08" thread, thought it was so clever that he'd put it into its own thread here.
Text of what he said:
Post 1 -
A Nuclear attack is not an option !
D@mn ! This kind of thinking is as bad as these leftwing loudmouths in Jew York City and its' propaganda machinery - the same
machinery that justified Prez Clinton's illegal bombing of Serbia
If we use such tactics, like Clinton did to Serbia(bombing the hell out of that country, in the future- New York City might get
nuked in retaliation, but then again, maybe that would not be such a bad idea .
Ironically, Michael Moore suggested on his website back in 1999 that their would be repercussions for Bill's illegal bombing of
Serbia - I wonder why he never apllied that statement to what happened on 9/11 . . .
1 posted on 01/26/2006 12:09:47 PM EST by Costigan