I saw this on Fox news this morning. They have speed loops embedded in the freeway to measure speed and if you are speeding they take your picture and eventually will send you a ticket. They have warning signs well in advance and yet folks continue to consistently exceed the 65Mph speed limit. They estimated income from the camera at $5M a month. It covers all three lanes in one direction.
To: Ben Mugged
Cool. I'd only need one ticket to learn my lesson!
2 posted on
01/23/2006 11:11:53 AM PST by
Mathews
(Shot... Splash... Out!)
To: Ben Mugged
This is utter money making Crapola!
notice how they use loops to prevent radar detection.
To: Ben Mugged
and if you are speeding they take your picture and eventually will send you a ticket.
Now, that's weird because Arizona does not require front license plates, and I'd think the pic needs to be snapped from the front to ID the driver.
4 posted on
01/23/2006 11:14:34 AM PST by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: Ben Mugged
FYI, they have positioned them on a stretch of freeway that lends itself to going faster, downhill etc. Just like the light ones where they trim down the yellow to get more, they impact safety to make more money claiming the entire thing is for safety. This is a boon for taxes and do not forget the insurance companies and traffic school revenue.
They are really pushing the limits of America with this, time for a Scottsdale "tea party"
To: Ben Mugged
I wonder how many warnings will be sent to those folks employed by Law Enforcement?
Riding with a Sheriff I quote "Yea, well who is going to pull me over?"
We were doing 85 in a 70, and we did it both ways (to and from the Courthouse which was about 60 miles round trip, and no I wasn't sitting in the back, it was for his reelection). Sheriffs don't do Traffic and Troopers don't do Sheriffs and I doubt it if the Photo Radars will do Sheriffs or Troopers.
This all amounts to just another TAX to fight.
TT
6 posted on
01/23/2006 11:19:54 AM PST by
TexasTransplant
(NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
To: Ben Mugged
A well placed wad of chewing gum should take care of things.
7 posted on
01/23/2006 11:20:25 AM PST by
6SJ7
To: Ben Mugged
I read a story last week about a clear spray you can coat your license plate with that defeats these traffic cameras. The stuff is flying off the shelves to areas that have these cameras.
9 posted on
01/23/2006 11:29:59 AM PST by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Ben Mugged
Looks like the city/county/state involved has found a new revenue stream.
To: Ben Mugged
If this nine-month test is successful, the city's photo radar system could become a model for the entire country. One can only hope that the cameras are destroyed on a daily basis making the test toally unsuccessful.
11 posted on
01/23/2006 11:35:08 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: Ben Mugged
I wonder if Johnette Lesbiano had any involvement in this idea?
12 posted on
01/23/2006 11:39:46 AM PST by
MadCharity
(If only the week could go by as fast as the hour of 24 does!!!)
To: All
Just out of curiosity - can anyone give me a logical reason why this might be considered an invasion of privacy or otherwise unconstitutional?
13 posted on
01/23/2006 11:49:44 AM PST by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: Ben Mugged
Great, except pictures without testimony aren't valid evidence in court. If people fight this, the state can't win.
14 posted on
01/23/2006 11:51:03 AM PST by
1L
To: Ben Mugged
If they wanted, they could do the same thing using your toll transponders like FASTPASS or EZ-Pass. It will not be long beofre they do this!
20 posted on
01/23/2006 12:04:48 PM PST by
Fierce Allegiance
(Rapidly nearing the third quarter of life.)
To: Ben Mugged
To: All
Just another reason to keep the truck off Wreck 101.
29 posted on
01/23/2006 12:24:02 PM PST by
AZ_Cowboy
("There they go again...")
To: Ben Mugged
It just isn't that hard to obey speed laws.
32 posted on
01/23/2006 12:33:11 PM PST by
aimhigh
To: Ben Mugged
The police state marches on.
49 posted on
01/23/2006 7:27:28 PM PST by
sweetliberty
(Stupidity should make you sterile.)
To: Ben Mugged
"They estimated income from the camera at $5M a month." Which is, of course, what it's really about. It has nothing to do with safety.
The upside is that, with that kind of money coming in, they will be able to eliminate taxes. Yeah; like that's gonna happen.
50 posted on
01/23/2006 7:30:55 PM PST by
sweetliberty
(Stupidity should make you sterile.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson