Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: isaiah55version11_0
I've never seen the new show (no cable) but I thought that the latest version was roundly considered to be "PC crap" with so-called empowered women, sleeze, and moral relativism. That stuff turns me off.

Is it really otherwise?

41 posted on 01/20/2006 9:12:45 AM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_Party_Animal

I saw the miniseries when my nephew gave me the DVD for Christmas.

It's not PC crap. It's a damn good show.


44 posted on 01/20/2006 9:14:30 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_Party_Animal

When I first heard of the changes, I was a skeptical as you are. So I had a prejudiced preconception in my mind when I watched the pilot. It was not PC at all! Sure, there were PC issues, but it wasn't preaching to you. You saw people faced with life and death dilemmas and some characters had PC solutions. But changing some of the characters to female didn't compromise the show. The characters are believeable and it's not a "look at the woman in this role, isn't it great!" You saw real characters, not 2 dimensional PC characters in those roles. If you can get the DVD's, I would recommend them. you won't regret it.


51 posted on 01/20/2006 9:21:20 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
Moral relativism it isn't. There's an ongoing debate among those who watch the show whether an attempted rape on a Cylon was actually rape since she is a machine. In the first episode they blow up a civil liner for the good of the fleet and the Commander barely blinks.

I want to vomit when I see "Commander in Chief" being nominated for Golden Globes and BSG being left out entirely.
53 posted on 01/20/2006 9:24:10 AM PST by brothers4thID (Being lectured by Ted Kennedy on ethics is not unlike being lectured on dating protocol by Ted Bundy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
I've never seen the new show (no cable) but I thought that the latest version was roundly considered to be "PC crap" with so-called empowered women, sleeze, and moral relativism. That stuff turns me off. Is it really otherwise?

It sort of depends on your POV. They are all faced with really difficult decisions, and even in the show admittedly don't always do the right thing. The latest one had the basic question, "Can I perform an immoral act that I think is necessary for survival and still call myself a human worthy of living?" The answer was a resounding no, you can't destroy your principles because of immediate necessity. Your view of what is necessary may be wrong.

61 posted on 01/20/2006 9:33:16 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
I've never seen the new show (no cable) but I thought that the latest version was roundly considered to be "PC crap" with so-called empowered women, sleeze, and moral relativism. That stuff turns me off. Is it really otherwise?

It really is otherwise (i.e. not "PC"). And very definitely not crap. Here is my mini-review of the show. It's actually one of the most conservative shows on TV.

80 posted on 01/20/2006 9:52:02 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson