It is Baldwin and you who claim people visiting adult stores are immoral or of bad character. My references are in relationship to what Baldwin's motives are: to exploit people who visit adult stores as immoral or of bad character by taking their photos and publishing them with the implication these are immoral people?. That is his purpose, is it not? And you support this, right?
Is it?
to exploit people who visit adult stores as immoral or of bad character by taking their photos and publishing them with the implication these are immoral people?.
We've been over this before. Publishing a pic of someone entering or leaving a public store is in the public doamain. You claim he is implying something. Where do you get an implication of anything? Again, a pic speaks for itself. Theres' no implication. It would be a pic of a fact. They entered the establishement.