Is it?
to exploit people who visit adult stores as immoral or of bad character by taking their photos and publishing them with the implication these are immoral people?.
We've been over this before. Publishing a pic of someone entering or leaving a public store is in the public doamain. You claim he is implying something. Where do you get an implication of anything? Again, a pic speaks for itself. Theres' no implication. It would be a pic of a fact. They entered the establishement.
What message is Baldwin trying to convey to the public about people who visit adult stores? What message is conveyed by publishing photos of people entering an adult store?
This is about the morality of people who visit these places, is it not?
What do you think will happen when (and if) Baldwin publishes photos of people entering an adult store with the in a context implicating they are immoral or of bad character? Will they run and hide because of shame like you might do, or would they sue him? What do you think?