Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: steveegg

Doesn't that rule only apply in cases of intentional grounding?


227 posted on 01/16/2006 11:25:00 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Doesn't that rule only apply in cases of intentional grounding?

That's where you usually see it, but I've seen a lineman get called for holding and it resulted in a safety. Obviously, the refs are going to give a lot of leeway in not wanting to call holding in the end zone, but this was blatant.

SD

231 posted on 01/16/2006 11:28:41 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
Doesn't that rule only apply in cases of intentional grounding?

No. It applies to any offensive penalty that occurs in the end zone (defined by the spot of enforcement rules). Intentional grounding, for some reason, is separately specifically mentioned as having the safety penalty

233 posted on 01/16/2006 11:38:13 AM PST by steveegg (Take two - throw those long knives at the DemonRATs and lieberals - and include the RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson