Posted on 01/12/2006 8:39:35 AM PST by dhls
Actually, I recommend being knowledgeable enough about the way things used to be done so that you can duplicate the look, and in an emergency, function without the power tools.
Consider New Orleans, for example.
I could actually do that.
Anyway, not everything can be done with power tools.
Yes, but it's slow - not realistic, unless there is a gap in the market for hand crafts.
There still some wheelwrights in Ireland that are in business, but they only make them for special purposes (shows, garden ornaments etc.)
We have a lot of people in this country who deliberately "keep history alive" by restoring the handcrafts as they were when the country was first settled.
Sometimes, entire towns are "historical sites."
Wood is one of the materials we deal with commonly where the tools were designed to fit the quirks of the material.
Power tools tend to just use more power to deal with problems, instead of working with the strengths and weaknesses of the wood.
We have two popular, and premier examples of woodworkers here, Roy Underhill and Norm Abram. Their techniques are diametrically opposed. Roy shows us the way things used to be done, and Norm has a power tool for every purpose.
Yet I have seen a number of times that the old-fashioned technique actually saved quite a bit of time, and made for a more sturdy product.
I know one old school trademan who refuses to buy power tools, but he is retired!!
I was actually more impressed with Roy Underhill...
You'll note that he is not only skinnier than Norm, but he's usually quite out of breath at the end of the show!
And that has what to do with his talent?
I often saw old style stairs that weren't well made.
That's part of what I mean about understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the wood.
People who have learned how to build things with hand tools seem to have a more basic understanding of the process, and hopefully would avoid that kind of error.
I've seen some nightmares, too. You have to ask yourself, "What were they thinking?"
Nothing at all, but it is illustrative of the fact that hand tools require physical labor, sometimes quite a bit of it!
Well, so does using a broom and mop instead of a Swiffer and vacuum cleaner, using a typewriter instead of a word processor, a dial phone instead of touch-tone, the list is endless.
But the tools are there to be used when they are needed. As long as they get the job done, who cares?
Trust me, we get to know the strengths and weaknesses of different kinds of timber;
red oak = spelches, swells readily.
white oak = twice as dense, more sturdy and stable.
pine (red deel) = weak spot at knots, loose sappy grain makes sanding difficult, shrinks readily.
American ash = suseptible to mould.
Teak = most reliable of all timbers, slightly tricky for sanding (particulary burred grain), can warp.
I knew a mechanic who used to invent and make a lot of his tools. Years later, of course, someone else invented power versions and got patents on them.
The belt sander is good for keeping tools sharp.
>But the tools are there to be used when they are needed. As long as they get the job done, who cares?
Eggsactly!
Use them tools or lose them!
Do ya hear, boy? I say, do ya hear?
How ya feelin'?
Are the headaches gone?
Teak is also one of those woods with a high concentration of silicate, which takes the edge off your tools.
Each species of wood seems to have its own utility. In carriages made of wood, dozens of species were used for different purposes.
We've transferred some of this thinking to using metals; iron in one place, copper in another, but wood was the primary ingredient in the structure of our lives for many centuries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.