To: Bush2000
Im telling you how they get them, Im pointing out to you the implications, and post 51 gives a more detailed explination and post the consiquences. There is no way you could unintentionally be this obtuse!
When only applied to production kernels and software redhat had 7 vunerabilities as opposed to Windows 44.
71 posted on
01/12/2006 1:51:02 PM PST by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: N3WBI3
When only applied to production kernels and software redhat had 7 vunerabilities as opposed to Windows 44.
LMFAO! You guys love to claim how quickly you address problems in open source code -- but now you find it convenient disavow versions which aren't part of a "production kernel". Well, too damned bad. You made your bed, now lie in your mess. When you include all of this multiple-version, widely available open-source Franken-crapware, you have more vulnerabilities than Windows. Period.
72 posted on
01/12/2006 2:02:55 PM PST by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: N3WBI3
Give it up. He obviously doesn't want to compare apples to apples.
74 posted on
01/12/2006 2:52:12 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson