Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which would give you better mail service a private company the U.S. Postal Service?
Myself | Myself

Posted on 01/08/2006 12:41:03 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked

Okay enquiring minds want to know :

Which would you prefer a private company delivering your mail or the U.S.P.S.?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: lameservice; postage; uspostalservice; usps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Since the U.S.P.S. can't seem to manage their finances properly, provide lousy service and have an attitude about it to boot, isn't it time to let a private company or companies take over the mail service in this country?
1 posted on 01/08/2006 12:41:06 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

The Post Office is privatised in the Netherlands and works just fine. Japan is about to privatise their post office. Britain has opened its postal service to competition and no ill effects.

It is unlikely the USA would suffer if it followed suit.

Regards, Ivan


2 posted on 01/08/2006 12:42:42 PM PST by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

It would help if I had put a private company OR the U.S. Postal Service. D'oh.


3 posted on 01/08/2006 12:43:31 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked ( God Bless our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
Finally..a thread with meaning and insight. And you say you wrote it yourself.yawn
4 posted on 01/08/2006 12:44:12 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

From a strictly economic standpoint, I'd have privatized the USPS long ago. But the USPS does have its uses, such as assigning ZIP codes and such. I wouldn't get rid of it completely, but I'd scale it back considerably. Like, they wouldn't deliver mail anymore.


5 posted on 01/08/2006 12:44:12 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

"Since the U.S.P.S. can't seem to manage their finances properly, provide lousy service and have an attitude about it to boot, isn't it time to let a private company or companies take over the mail service in this country?"




Sure. Why not? The first company that shows up offering to deliver a letter to any address in the country for 39 cents gets my business.

What? No takers? Never mind. I have the USPS.

How about a 1-pound box delivered to any address in the USA, Puerto Rico, Guam, or other US holdings for $4.05. And they'll even supply the box at no charge.

What? No takers? Never mind. I have the USPS.

How about a convenient office in every small town in the USA where you can send your letters and packages?

What? No takers? Never mind. I have the USPS.


6 posted on 01/08/2006 12:45:15 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"The Post Office is privatised in the Netherlands and works just fine. Japan is about to privatise their post office. Britain has opened its postal service to competition and no ill effects."

How huge is the delivery area for the Netherlands? How about Japan? Most private forms will not deliver to out-of-way areas. That's what keeps them profitable. They can chose where they'll deliver. If it's not profitable, tough.

The USPS has to delivery everywhere, including isolated areas in Alska, for instance.


7 posted on 01/08/2006 12:46:41 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

So you don't even have to wonder why you are banned from time to time. That IS good.


8 posted on 01/08/2006 12:47:30 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked ( God Bless our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

I will double check, but I believe the Post in Australia is privatised too; thus the argument about out of the way areas is moot.

That said, there are plenty of out the way areas in Britain too. Yet the Post Office is commercially successful.

Regards, Ivan


9 posted on 01/08/2006 12:48:41 PM PST by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Can the USPS do all that without tax subsidies? If not, you're *still* paying more for their services. It's just that you're paying them 1) whether or not you're actually using them, and 2) on your income taxes instead of at point of sale.


10 posted on 01/08/2006 12:50:37 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

80% of my mail is unsolicited junk, and I only buy 2 books of stamps per year. I would rather pay 50 cents per stamp to a private company than continue with the USPS. Government postal and rail service needs to be phased out.


11 posted on 01/08/2006 12:51:21 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
provide lousy service

I completely disagree. What examples do you have that make you come to that conclusion?

I think the USPS just gets bagged on because they are a government entity.

I think they do a magnificent job, for very little money. You think spending $.37 or $.39 is too much to ask to take a letter anywhere?

I am amazed they don't make more mistakes, given the magnitude of the job.

My hat is off to every mailman in this country, who get my mail to me everyday, rain or shine.

12 posted on 01/08/2006 12:52:49 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
It's already privatized. It's called email. It's free and it delivers even to the other side of the world in seconds. Sounds like the post office loses this one.
13 posted on 01/08/2006 12:53:13 PM PST by Nateman ( Clinton happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
The problem is, if it costs the USPS more to deliver to that out-of-the-way place than the thirty-nine cents it cost to send that letter, then that means that other people are paying for that service, instead of the person sending the letter.

Higher rates to out-of-the-way places would result in costs to deliver to more populous areas dropping. End result: everyone gets what they pay for.

14 posted on 01/08/2006 12:54:02 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"I will double check, but I believe the Post in Australia is privatised too; thus the argument about out of the way areas is moot.

That said, there are plenty of out the way areas in Britain too. Yet the Post Office is commercially successful."

Have you taken a look at a map of the U.S. lately? It's just a wee bit bigger than those 2 countries and not contiguous.


15 posted on 01/08/2006 12:54:40 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

Since I have no basis for comparison, this is a tough question to answer. A private company MIGHT be better but would they be cheaper?


16 posted on 01/08/2006 12:55:05 PM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

Keep the U.S. Postal Service!!!- Otherwise, the bars in America will be empty between 2:00 and 5:00 pm.


17 posted on 01/08/2006 12:55:36 PM PST by fat city ("The nation that controls magnetism controls the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teenyelliott

I have no problem whatsoever with postal employees. I just think that a private entity could do the job better.


18 posted on 01/08/2006 12:55:46 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

Any idea what it would cost to build and run a nationwide mail distribution system equal to what the post office operates? No thanks. I'm not generally a fan of government monopolies, but occasionally they make sense. If the USPS were privatized it would inevitably end up being 200 separate companies all trying to coordinate with each other to get the mail delivered.


19 posted on 01/08/2006 12:56:33 PM PST by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

I use FedEx or UPS, it may cost more but I know the item will get there when I send it.

The last time I sent something important via usps they lost it, however if I sent a box of rocks usps 3rd class to Siberia it would be there the next day.


20 posted on 01/08/2006 12:56:45 PM PST by ChefKeith (Flies,fleas,ants,ticks,cockroaches,lawyers,judges & politicians All the same. Useless!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson