Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

No because the runningback already has possession. Like I said the key is "with possession" a receiver that is falling during the reception is not "with possession" until he finishes falling, his feet are immaterial (unless one comes down out of bounds), what matters is possession, he didn't have it. An RB that already has possession ends play when the ball touches the line so there can't be a fumble because play is over, play isn't over on a pass until it's a reception or not.


287 posted on 01/07/2006 5:03:07 PM PST by discostu (a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

I believe you. If Dallas had been on defense it would have been ruled a TD.


289 posted on 01/07/2006 5:04:09 PM PST by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson