Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/04/2006 6:26:21 PM PST by TFFKAMM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TFFKAMM
a lawsuit by a Massachusetts woman who says she got stomach cramps and had to use the bathroom quickly after eating the snacks.

Let her show damages.

Personally, I'd let her sue, and simply use every opportunity to let the public know this silly twit sued over diarrhea.

2 posted on 01/04/2006 6:28:30 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM
"If the law says we don't have to have (a label), we don't see the need for it either..."

Game, set and match, ya bozo.
3 posted on 01/04/2006 6:28:56 PM PST by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

Its director of litigation, Stephen Gardner, accused Frito-Lay of trying to hide the consequences of eating products with olestra despite more than 20,000 consumer complaints.

And despite about a million news reports about olestra causing diarrhea.


4 posted on 01/04/2006 6:29:04 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

> ... demanding that Frito-Lay put warning labels on
> chips with the fat substitute olestra ...

I avoid oileakstra products, but I thought they already
had the warnings.


5 posted on 01/04/2006 6:30:37 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

LOL I guess she never watched the MAD TV skits about "anal leakage" ROFL!!!!


6 posted on 01/04/2006 6:30:49 PM PST by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM
Not to be too graphic here, but I used to buy the olestra chips. On the back of the package there is/was a warning that stated... "may cause rectal seepage".

At the time I was trying to be healthier, but if I was going to have to deal with that as a side effect, I didn't really eat that many chips to make it worth the benefits and extra cost.

7 posted on 01/04/2006 6:31:18 PM PST by infidel29 ("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM
The Frito-Lay website still shows Olestra on the label:


9 posted on 01/04/2006 6:33:20 PM PST by FReepaholic (Admitted FReepaholic since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

Do not click this link:

http://www.cspinet.org/new/flaynal.html


10 posted on 01/04/2006 6:34:06 PM PST by A.Hun (Democrats suck worse than ice storms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

Maybe she should just stop eating the chips... Oh what that would make to much sense.


11 posted on 01/04/2006 6:34:55 PM PST by Xenophobic Alien (Kerry lost. Please take that stupid bumper sticker off your car!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

I, um, knew this two days after the product was released. This was a well-known side-effect of rapid eating of this stuff. But what kind of idiot sues over it?


12 posted on 01/04/2006 6:36:16 PM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

There's all kinds of unwanted digestive output she could sue over. Is she going to sue Hormel to put warning labels on cans of chili? Baked beans? Bean dip?


13 posted on 01/04/2006 6:36:53 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

She just now found out about this? It's been known ever since it came out that this was a possible side effect.


15 posted on 01/04/2006 6:44:51 PM PST by CajunConservative (Don't Blame Me, I Voted for Jindal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

If she thinks this is bad, consider the "weight loss" drug Xenical.

I have patients who ask me about this stuff and I inform them that it is guaranteed to cause "intestinal urgency" and skid marks in their drawers.

Haven't written a prescription for it yet.

Then again, if you knew you were going to mess your pants with every meal it would probably cut down on your food consumption...


17 posted on 01/04/2006 7:28:50 PM PST by 43north (Liberals are obsessed by the vulgarity of their lives & the obscenity of their behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

Damn, I'm going to sue the water department of Mexico City.


18 posted on 01/04/2006 7:32:57 PM PST by Koblenz (Holland: a very tolerant country. Until someone shoots you on a public street in broad daylight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

So, she shouldn't eat a whole bag of them at one sitting.

That said, anyone who eats "food" with so many ingredients you need a magnifying glass, 10 minutes, and a technical dictionary to read them, gets what they deserve.


20 posted on 01/04/2006 8:42:30 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TFFKAMM

Hmmm...stop eating the chips or find a sleazebag lawyer and sue Frito - Lay...choices, choices.

Another life lottery player, I hope she gets skunked.


22 posted on 01/04/2006 10:14:00 PM PST by hattend (There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson