Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2006 6:02:07 PM PST by TexasPatriot8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TexasPatriot8

2 posted on 01/02/2006 6:05:25 PM PST by cmsgop ( Bill Clinton's License Plate..... "Herpes 1")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
Thank goodness San Francisco is not on their list.

We mustn't let the enemy find out that San Francisco is the secret headquarters of the international zionist crusader cabal.
3 posted on 01/02/2006 6:05:33 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

You need to cite your source.


4 posted on 01/02/2006 6:05:41 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
Damn! I got a similar thing from my second cousin's husband's brother's son's wife's mother's sister-in-law.

Although an excellent source (my second cousin's husband's brother's son's wife's mother's sister-in-law) I'm not sure I believe that there are functional nukes available. Dirty bombs, yes.

5 posted on 01/02/2006 6:06:19 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

we've been over this again and again on various FR threads.


6 posted on 01/02/2006 6:06:35 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

A real stomach churner. Some of us have been living under threat of total thermonuclear annihilation since the 50s. The main problem with the new threat is that it will be hard to identify a worthy target to incinerate. Otherwise, it is a weak cousin to the real thing.


8 posted on 01/02/2006 6:10:30 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546635/posts
12 posted on 01/02/2006 6:13:26 PM PST by vigilante2 (vigilant attentiveness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
The other cities monitored include Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, New York, and Seattle.

If they take out Seattle, Washington will become a red state.

15 posted on 01/02/2006 6:19:57 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Libs: Celebrate MY diversity, eh! || Iran Azadi 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

Welcome to Free Republic. Hope your stay is informative as well as fun. As indicated by oceanview, we have waded through this info a number of times. But one can share your concerns.


17 posted on 01/02/2006 6:22:17 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

The source is World Net Daily. Thank you..I hadn't read this before.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546635/posts


38 posted on 01/02/2006 7:18:57 PM PST by rirepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
On July 11, 2005, we first reported on al-Qaida's decade-long plans to detonate nuclear devices in seven major U.S. cities simultaneously in an operation it calls "American Hiroshima."

In numerous cases, reports U.S. News, the monitoring required investigators to go on to the property under surveillance, although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained.

It appears US News is your source, right?

48 posted on 01/02/2006 8:33:54 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

You sure get around newbie; from brokeback mountain to the SHEER MADNESS!!!! of nukes. In the words of Dan Rather "Courage" or was it "What's the Frequency Kenneth"? or whatever. Nice tag line, and the phrasing remind me of a certain Starship Trooper film. Interesting.


49 posted on 01/02/2006 8:45:02 PM PST by ricks_place (Vote Republican. A conservative America, for a better future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8
"Each suitcase weighed between 50 and 80 kilograms (approximately 110 to 176 pounds) and contained enough fissionable plutonium and uranium to produce an explosive yield in excess of two kilotons,"

The yield may be close, but at only 50 – 80 kilos there wouldn’t be much shielding. They would be easy to find.
60 posted on 01/08/2006 3:18:56 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasPatriot8

Welcome to FR from a fellow Texan. Your post was fine.


78 posted on 01/16/2006 6:34:43 PM PST by toomanygrasshoppers ("In technical terminology, he's a loon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson