Posted on 12/29/2005 4:15:26 AM PST by mainepatsfan
Carroll agrees to contract extension with USC Associated Press
LOS ANGELES -- Pete Carroll, who coached Southern California from mediocrity to dominance since being hired in 2001, agreed to a contract extension with the school.
Neither Carroll nor USC athletic director Mike Garrett would provide specifics of the deal.
"We love what Pete is doing here," Garrett said in a statement issued late Wednesday. "He does a great job of winning games and graduating players. Pete wants to be at USC as long as he can and we want him here, too."
The top-ranked Trojans are one win away from an unprecedented third straight national championship, an accomplishment they can achieve by beating No. 2 Texas in the Rose Bowl next Wednesday night.
USC enters the Rose Bowl with a 34-game winning streak, and has a 48-3 record the past four seasons after going 6-6 in Carroll's first year.
"We talked today -- we had a nice little talk today," the 54-year-old Carroll said of his conversation with Garrett. "We've been on a great wavelength. I haven't been anywhere five years before. I've been a mercenary coach my whole life.
"I've talked with Mike. We're in great shape for the future. This is a good time for this. There'll be a tremendous amount of movement in the NFL a week from now."
Carroll was an NFL coach from 1984-99, serving as an assistant with the Buffalo Bills, Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets and San Francisco 49ers. He was the head coach of the Jets for one season and the New England Patriots for three.
The Patriots fired Carroll after the 1999 season, and he took a year off before being hired by USC, where he clearly wasn't the first choice.
But he turned out to be the best choice.
It's been speculated on several occasions that Carroll would return to the NFL, but he's always said he wasn't interested.
"It looks like it should be very clear that where we sit right now is a terrific opportunity for me," he said. "This is an awesome place to be. I really don't see any alternatives that can match what we're doing here."
When the subject of money was brought up, Carroll replied: "That doesn't seem like an alternative. That seems like a benefit."
Carroll said he has all the freedom he could ask for at USC.
"I'm in great shape. I couldn't be more comfortable with how things are working," he said. "It's as good a situation as you can get. I think there's no question that it's fit beautifully -- it really has. I love being here. We're lucky. I love being in this whole energy level of sports. It's awesome."
Carroll refused to say how long he'll coach at USC.
"I've got to be able to sustain. I'm just going to keep rockin' and rollin' as long as we can go," he said. "They've supported what we've done here and given me the opportunity to be here for a long time. I've just got to maintain my health."
Carroll's first team at USC began 2-5 before winning four of its last five games. The 2002 team went 11-2; the 2003 team went 12-1, the 2004 team went 13-0, and the current team is 12-0.
Carroll succeeded Paul Hackett, who was fired after going 19-18 in three years on the job. Hackett replaced John Robinson, who was 37-21-2 in five years during his second tour of duty as the USC coach. The Trojans were 12-11 in Robinson's last two seasons.
ping
Carroll is better suited to the college atmosphere. He was a good coach in New England and his players liked him but there just wasn't enough accountability.
"He was a good coach in New England and his players liked him..."
Nice to see someone report things as they were. Amazing that Pete Carroll's NFL experience is always presented as having been a 'failure'. It's almost as though that since he didn't put up USC-type W/L numbers in the NFL, he didn't do well.
Who cares? He's just another California pretty boy!
Hook'em!
Some coaches, like Parcells, are better suited to the mercenary atmosphere of the NFL. Others, like Bowden and JoePa, are better fit for college ball. Pete Carroll finally figured out where he belongs. I'm no Trojan fan, but congrats to USC and Carroll for making the right call.
I agree. My above comment was posted just to draw some trask talk from some Trojan fans.
Carrol looks like he is having fun coaching at the college level which is rare in the pros. Mack Brown is looking more and more like that and I think it has an effect on the players attitudes too.
Just wanted to throw this out there.
The weak Big XII North is 2-1 in bowl games so far, now go on with the previously started thread.
As an LSU and ultimately, SEC, fan, I have almost no interest in who's coaching Southern Cal. But this seems like the best fit for a coach and a school since the Bear invaded Tuscaloosa. I wish them both well, but not too many National titles.
He's enjoying the fact that for the first time in forever, Oklahoma didn't wax his butt this year.
Ouch, that hurts....How many National Championships have you won in the last 50 years????????
Guys, I have no dog in this fight, but show a little humility in victory, and a little pride in defeat. I don't know what will happen in Pasadena, but all the rest of FReeperdom who loves college football but not USC would love it if you would get over yourselves.
We have a few to answer your question. Just relax, Troy. After Jan 4 we can go back to attacking the left.
ABG...Just having a little fun with the South Texan. After 1/4 we will all be friendly again.
Fight On!!
er! I mean
Hook'er!!
(I'm sorry I just can't help myself)
I really liked Pete Carroll as a person and he wasn't a bad coach for the Patriots (his winning percentage was above .500 with two playoff appearances). He was just too nice for the NFL.
"Hooker" Horns. That's a new one, they must hang out on somewhere on 6th avenue!
I didn't think he got a fair shake with the Jets.
They really need Texas to improve upon Oklahoma's performance from last year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.