Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Movie isn't just pro-gay, but anti-marriage (Medved on Brokeback Mtn)
JWR ^ | Dec 18 05 | Michael Medved

Posted on 12/20/2005 10:09:17 PM PST by churchillbuff

one key factor in the plot: both men are married, with children, and their long-standing relationship ultimately destroys both marriages.

Would commentators similarly applaud a story of cheating, if the adultery involved a married man and a married woman?

The main problem with "Broke Back Mountain" isn't that it's pro-gay; it's that the emphasis on following your urges rather than honoring your responsibilities is, at its heart, anti-marriage

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: barebackmountain; genderdysphoria; hollyweird; hollywoodleft; homosexualagenda; medved; michaelmedved; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: SteveMcKing

No... I think a lot of other people wear the funny hats, too. :)


61 posted on 12/21/2005 9:48:50 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Sheep herders are always out to get ewe.


62 posted on 12/21/2005 9:51:46 AM PST by IamConservative (Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"Would commentators similarly applaud a story of cheating, if the adultery involved a married man and a married woman?"

Didn't Medved see "Bridges of Madison County"? Cheating is NOT a new plotline.


63 posted on 12/21/2005 9:54:54 AM PST by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

So that's what Edwards did with that little kielbasi he bought.


64 posted on 12/21/2005 9:57:43 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Historically sheepherders were considered scum of the earth by any real cowboy. There were lots of deadly turf battles between the two. Sheep ruined many parts of the prairie by eating plants and grasses right off at the roots leaving very little for other animals to eat or to grow back. Also caused lots of erosion later blamed on cattle.

I think it is appropriate that these are sheepboys in more ways than one.


65 posted on 12/21/2005 9:59:05 AM PST by tertiary01 (Dems ..the party that repeats history's mistakes over and over and....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lesforlife
Don't let Michael snow you on this one. I turned off my radio while listening to him go on and on about how brilliant the film is. MEDVED FRAUD ALERT!!

Excuse me?

I AGREE with Michael about this disgusting movie BUT I do not need Medved or anyone else to "Snow me" about what a POS this movie is. I am a PRO-FAMILY person and I am sick and tired of how cheap marriage has become to those peddling their twisted, disgusting, pathetic lifestyles through movies.
66 posted on 12/21/2005 10:26:26 AM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

HEY! Don't misuse Lefty's image like that! He is a good family man!!!


67 posted on 12/21/2005 10:28:21 AM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I agree abut the film - go ask Meved why he thinks it "brilliant!"


68 posted on 12/21/2005 10:35:43 AM PST by Lesforlife ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lesforlife
I agree abut the film - go ask Meved why he thinks it "brilliant"

He is a movie critic. He was talking about the technical aspects of the movie, not the subject. He hates the subject and does not recommend anyone see the film.
69 posted on 12/21/2005 10:50:10 AM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Its sad but I have read posts on FR from some people that applauded that kind of thing. Happily it was rare. But I have seen them before.
70 posted on 12/21/2005 10:57:04 AM PST by jecIIny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domini. Qui fecit coelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
See post 26.
71 posted on 12/21/2005 10:58:14 AM PST by jecIIny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domini. Qui fecit coelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jecIIny

There's a lot of sarcasm on this thread. You'll have to give a better example than "says who?"


72 posted on 12/21/2005 11:39:14 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Santa Claus is an illegal alien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I'm sure he was talking about the technical aspects but if he were viewing gassing of holocaust victims would he applaud the
technical brilliance of the film crew?

The movie has graphic scenes of gay sex (porn) and he speaks of it
as brilliant filmmaking.

I won't listen to him anymore.


73 posted on 12/21/2005 11:43:28 AM PST by Lesforlife ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jecIIny
As a side note, it goes without saying that adultery or any other sin is not an excuse for violence which must be strongly condemned as well.

"violence", a liberal buzzword, is not an excuse for homosexual activity either -both are crimes against humanity. In fact, both are only related because both are disordered -disorder tends to breed disorder. If you have a problem with a poster that is posting violent messages then I suggest you hit the abuse button and report the posting - otherwise you are just disparaging FR members in general, parroting the homosexual agenda -promulgating propaganda rather than observing, acting upon and dealing with a reality.

74 posted on 12/21/2005 1:37:02 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Bubbatuck
Personally, between the homosexuals and the gangsters, I'd rather lose the gangsters. Should we protest every Martin Scorcese movie? I hate serial murderers, too - should we protest Jonathan Demme? I hate birds who peck out the eyes of schoolteachers - Darn that Hitchcock!!!

Don't forget the vampires. Way too many movies about vampires.

76 posted on 12/21/2005 5:41:44 PM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rdosser
Yeah, a real cowboy.

He is a former governor of Texas. How more qualified should one be to present such an image?

77 posted on 12/21/2005 7:12:19 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
The main problem with "Broke Back Mountain" isn't that it's pro-gay; it's that the emphasis on following your urges rather than honoring your responsibilities is, at its heart, anti-marriage

Why confuse us with facts. I mean, the Episcopal church takes the identical position as the movie with regard to ordaining gays who left their wife and children for their gay lover. Who are we to question why? < /end sarcasm>

78 posted on 12/21/2005 7:18:31 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chronic_loser
I understand it is two extremely sensitive homos who give the sheep a break by getting it on with each other.

I saw Medved on O'Reilly's show a couple of nights ago, and he referred to it as "the infamous pup tent scene". He said he saw people (his wording seem to indicate men) walking out of the film at that point.

He seemed to think that this film had gotten so much publicity that everyone should have known what they were getting into. Personally, I don't think people pay all that much attention to film reviews. They may have heard "gay cowboy" without knowing that you were going to be given a very up close and personal look at what actually goes on between two "gay cowboys".

79 posted on 12/21/2005 7:22:42 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl
It cost $14 mil to make. As of last weekend (week 2) it has grossed $3,474,311.

To be honest about the numbers, the first week it was out it was only in 5 theaters, and those in large cities (presumably with large gay populations). The second week it was in (I think) 64 or 65 theatres.

Now, I assume that the people putting out this drek are thinking that with all the free publicity the film is garnering, that when it goes national it will pull in business. I really doubt that will happen. It is going to die out in the general population. This thing was done strictly to (1) push an agenda; and, (2) get a lot of awards.

80 posted on 12/21/2005 7:26:48 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson