I don't understand this either. What is the actual basis of the charge, how was the charge substantiated, is there more to the charge than a simple 'she said'? If a rape kit could easily exonerate him, why was it not performed? Is this fellow being railroaded by a 'feminazi' court?
"Is this fellow being railroaded by a 'feminazi' court?"
Far as I'm concerned, it flunks the smell test and a closer look is required.