[dsc]

"Is this fellow being railroaded by a 'feminazi' court?"

Far as I'm concerned, it flunks the smell test and a closer look is required.

[the anti-liberal]

Came across this while trying to learn about Justice Margaret Eberhard:

Wednesday, November 2

The 95th Percentile

Mischa Beutling, a 6'7", 240 pound 21-year-old is fighting charges of sexual assualt by claiming his penis is simply too big to have been used to commit the crime. A urologist testified as an expert witness and brought with him a plastic model of a penis measuring 8.5" by 6.5". These figures place Beutling in the "top 5% range for size in comparison to the doctor's other patients." Really? Sounds big, but not that big, especially in proportion to his height.

My favorite line from the story: "Justice Margaret Eberhard must weigh the evidence, including the plastic model." I can just picture it now, trying it on for size, exclaiming, "Oh, this is nothing!"

Beaverhausen Blog: The 95th Percentile

[the anti-liberal]

And from another source:

"He said a woman who has not given birth might have discomfort or tearing if she had intercourse with a penis that size, especially if she was not sexually aroused. But Crown attorney Bhavna Bhangu scoffed at the account, noting that Beutling’s reference to his size as a “two-by-four” is an exaggeration compared to the size of the plastic model.

“It’s hardly a two-by-four,” she said. She also noted that he has never actually measured himself. Bhangu also said the “size theory” was never put to the complainant on the witness stand for her account. Bhangu said the woman was traumatized when Beutling, who is 6-foot-7 and 240 pounds and who she believed was her close friend, forced himself on her. Justice Margaret Eberhard must weigh the evidence, including the plastic model. A verdict is expected next month."

Barking Moonbat Early Warning System

Still not passing the smell test- is Justice Margaret Eberhard a feminazi who is simply ignoring the defendant's case?

[the anti-liberal]

Actually, the more I think about this, I have to wonder- why didn't the defense lawyer in this case question the complainant on this specific point (size, discomfort, vaginal tearing, etc)? Could the defense lawyer be that incompetent?