[dsc]

"she noted the female was never questioned on the witness stand about it, nor did she report any physical pain, discomfort or injury."

I'm not getting that. The female didn't report what she would have reported if she had been forcibly raped by a telephone pole that size, so that proves she was raped?

Huh?

[mother22wife21]

My thinking also.I'm not sure how one specially prepares for those proportions,but, unless she is anatomically unusual also,there would have been some discomfort to speak of if not scream about.

And not the good screams.

Then again,perhaps she became less enthused with the proposition once she commenced the special preps? He didn't want to stop though.

[the anti-liberal]

"she noted the female was never questioned on the witness stand about it, nor did she report any physical pain, discomfort or injury."

I don't understand this either. What is the actual basis of the charge, how was the charge substantiated, is there more to the charge than a simple 'she said'? If a rape kit could easily exonerate him, why was it not performed? Is this fellow being railroaded by a 'feminazi' court?