Posted on 12/03/2005 7:43:02 AM PST by ncountylee
Maybe asking for "a smoke"
is a gay pick up . .
In UK they "light up a fag"
No doubt. He might even be the poster boy for the anti- smokers crowd.
And if they would just end the brownshirt war on drugs, that guy could have been happily smoking marijuana or crack instead...
(/sarcasm)
Sorry, I had to make the (/sarcasm) big enough for the blurry eyed drug advocates in case they run crying to the Admin Moderator...
. . . there has to be an invisible sun
it gives its heat to everyone . . .
If New York allowed smoking in bars, this would never have happened. Bring back Rudy.
"'A murder committed in the course of a felony' makes it sound as if the murder ISN'T the felony."
Right. What these 2nd degree murder laws usually do is this:
Two guys get guns and go down to rob a store. They don't intend to kill anybody, but while one of them gets careless and discharges a round, killing the clerk.
It can be a total accident, but both the robbers are guilty of capital murder because the killing happened in the course of a felony: armed robbery. They didn't mean to kill anybody, but if they hadn't set out to commit an armed robbery, nobody would have died.
In the cigarette shooting, if the killing happened in the course of another felony, and there's probably something felonious about popping off rounds on a city street, Singh can argue all he wants that he didn't intend to kill anybody, and it won't help him a bit.
He can still be convicted of capital murder and executed, even without premeditation.
"Well, you know, young folk . . .
Maybe asking for "a smoke"
is a gay pick up . . ."
From Ween's Mr. Richard Smoker:
"mister richard smoker
you're a velvet coker
Bruce and Geoff will
pick you up at ten
goin' out
dancin' in the city
friday night
gotta look pretty
tonight we'll tango in the street
you eat
dog meat"
You might be on to something there.
I'd like to check the immigration status of this entire bunch of gangstas. It appears that NYC's gun laws are not being followed by some of its much-celebrated diverse population.
UGH!
I never will understand people who think words (or even actions) can replace the irreplaceable.
"How can one shoot a gun 6 or 7 times WITHOUT the intent to hit them?"
Oh, I suppose if one is an inebriated idiot, one might be intending only to frighten. Doesn't matter, though; a killing in the commission of a felony is murder.
"How can one shoot a gun 6 or 7 time and only hit the target only once?"
You have fired a pistol, right? It's a lot harder than most people think, especially in a moving vehicle, at night, possibly with a load on.
"How is it that you can pull a gun on someone without the premeditation, all be it a few seconds, of killing them?"
I'm not a lawyer, but I think the standard for premeditation is a bit higher than that. And, as I noted above, there's no accounting for what an inebriated idiot might do.
But he didn't know that he hit him. Don't you understand?
Send him to Singh-Singh.
So it's basically causing a death during an act of personal stupidity.
Like 'vehicular homicide' if someone purposely travels the wrong way on an interstate and causes an *accident*.
Any relation to Ofdeeyi Singh?"
LOL!!!
"So it's basically causing a death during an act of personal stupidity."
Well, during a felony. If what you're doing is stupid without being a felony, then other laws apply.
"Like 'vehicular homicide' if someone purposely travels the wrong way on an interstate and causes an *accident*."
Similar in philosophy, I think. You might not have intended to kill anyone, but you did intend to commit this other crime, and if you hadn't done that nobody would have died.
What? Have the Bloods embraced affirmative action to the point they are admitting Sikh members?
I don't get it.
I'm sure he was a fine upstanding citizen who was merely a suspect in both of those crimes. After all, he may be a suspect but he hadn't actually been charged from what the article says.
Of course the poor upstanding citizen was again himself a victim in the latest incident. We all know how those eeevil guns can leap into someone's hand, start indiscriminately firing and end up by a fluke, hitting and killing someone. Besides, how dare anyone ask for a cigarette with the intent of committing the crime of smoking!
Need I add a /sarc?
The question is: Why was he walking the streets? Why was he not in jail without bond?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.