Replies

"...eat crow..."

You have failed to carefully read my posts. I did not defend nor attack Mr. Brooks as an individual, unlike others on this thread.

I simply stated that Mr. Brooks has a right to enjoy the fruits of his labor, provided he earned it within the boundaries of the law. If he chooses to lavish his daughter with an expensive birthday party, that is his prerogative.

Furthermore, I questioned the accuracy of the report. No reliable sources were ever quoted, and the reporters did not provide substantial evidence proving that Mr. Brooks was a money grubbing, ruthless contractor.

I asked for more information, but was provided nothing more than another article from a left wing news source.

Questioning the integrity of the report does not automatically mean that I am not interested in the issue of unlawful business dealings, especially when it involves the safety of our troops.

My suspicions lie with the motivations of those news outlets which use their medium to promote a socialist/communist agenda through fabricated or misrepresented stories.

If Mr. Brooks is in fact guilty of selling defective equipment with full knowledge of their inferiority, I'll be more than happy to "eat crow".