Replies

Which, and how many, of the countless posts of voluminous works/scientists opinions, already cited by various FReepers with whom you disagree, have you found credible?

I can't recall any off the top of my head. That was kind of the point in asking for you to provide some examples.

No creationist on this thread has offered "contemporary dissent backed with empirical evidence". Not even close

I can't recall any off the top of my head. That was kind of the point in asking for you to provide some examples.

And your posts point out the very reason I asked; there is no point in attempting a discussion (I use that term in jest, as that is not even close to the display almost always seen on these threads in the name of "debate") with people who dismiss everything posted out of hand.

Your opinions are that the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions than the ones your and those in your "ping list/group" (i.e., FR evolutionarians) hold, are NOT CREDIBLE.

It's truly amazing....I've never seen such a consensus of opinion in the real world, science or otherwise.